SEPI vs. ACYS
SEPI (Shelton Equity Premium Income ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEPI charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
SEPI vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SEPI
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 10.21%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEPI vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SEPI Shelton Equity Premium Income ETF | 6.41% |
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEPI and ACYS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEPI vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shelton Equity Premium Income ETF (SEPI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEPI vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEPI drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPI and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEPI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -0.63% | -7.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -0.10% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -0.14% | -1.27% |
Volatility
SEPI vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEPI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.56% | 3.38% | +9.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 3.38% | +9.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 3.38% | +9.18% |
SEPI vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEPI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEPI vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
SEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% | 0.00% |
SEPI Shelton Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.41% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEPI and ACYS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEPI is cheaper at 0.54% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEPI is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.
SEPI has the higher dividend yield at 5.41%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: Shelton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for SEPI and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for SEPI and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer