SENS vs. OUST
SENS (Senseonics Holdings, Inc.) and OUST (Ouster, Inc.) are both stocks. SENS operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while OUST operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 5 years, SENS returned -38.42%/yr vs -18.39%/yr for OUST. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SENS vs. OUST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SENS achieves a 15.22% return, which is significantly lower than OUST's 120.33% return.
SENS
- 1D
- -5.64%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 15.22%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- -37.76%
- 3Y*
- -26.98%
- 5Y*
- -38.42%
- 10Y*
- -21.93%
OUST
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 28.76%
- YTD
- 120.33%
- 6M
- 108.03%
- 1Y
- 121.46%
- 3Y*
- 106.43%
- 5Y*
- -18.39%
- 10Y*
- —
SENS vs. OUST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SENS Senseonics Holdings, Inc. | 15.22% | -47.27% | -8.19% | -44.65% | -61.42% | 206.26% | 120.10% |
OUST Ouster, Inc. | 120.33% | 77.09% | 59.32% | -11.12% | -83.40% | -61.48% | 39.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SENS and OUST is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2020 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
SENS:
$291.43M
OUST:
$2.95B
SENS:
-$2.17
OUST:
-$0.94
SENS:
6.09
OUST:
15.36
SENS:
8.49
OUST:
10.70
SENS:
$42.36M
OUST:
$185.33M
SENS:
$22.03M
OUST:
$90.79M
SENS:
-$72.86M
OUST:
-$50.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SENS vs. OUST — Risk / Return Rank
SENS
OUST
SENS vs. OUST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS) and Ouster, Inc. (OUST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SENS | OUST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.24 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 2.22 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 4.10 | -5.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SENS vs. OUST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SENS drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, roughly equal to the maximum OUST drawdown of -98.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENS and OUST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SENS | OUST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.26% | -98.01% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.19% | -55.15% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.92% | -64.00% | -16.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.96% | -97.51% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.97% | -70.66% | -23.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.67% | -78.00% | +14.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.87% | 29.77% | +7.10% |
Volatility
SENS vs. OUST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS) is 18.23%, while Ouster, Inc. (OUST) has a volatility of 36.05%. This indicates that SENS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OUST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SENS | OUST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.23% | 36.05% | -17.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.38% | 68.89% | -12.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.39% | 98.35% | -24.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.35% | 96.77% | -7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.28% | 95.74% | -2.46% |
Dividends
SENS vs. OUST - Dividend Comparison
Neither SENS nor OUST has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SENS vs. OUST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Senseonics Holdings, Inc. and Ouster, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SENS and OUST have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OUST has higher volatility (36.05%) compared to SENS (18.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SENS dropped -95.26% vs OUST's -98.01%.
OUST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SENS and OUST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer