PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SENS vs. KO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SENS vs. KO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SENS achieves a -5.34% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 25.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SENS has underperformed KO with an annualized return of -22.14%, while KO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.56% annualized return.


SENS

1D
3.88%
1M
-4.65%
6M
-27.93%
YTD
-5.34%
1Y
-46.55%
3Y*
-32.52%
5Y*
-38.75%
10Y*
-22.14%
ALL TIME*
-21.75%

KO

1D
-0.83%
1M
3.23%
6M
16.85%
YTD
25.91%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
16.05%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
10.56%
ALL TIME*
12.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.57B$1.49B$1.47B
$2.29M$2.54M$4.55M

SENS vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SENS
Senseonics Holdings, Inc.
-5.34%-47.27%-8.19%-44.65%-61.42%206.26%-4.83%-64.63%-2.63%-0.37%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
25.91%15.60%8.88%-4.43%10.61%11.37%2.47%20.60%6.77%14.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SENS and KO is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2016

0.05

The correlation between SENS and KO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SENS:

$218.37M

KO:

$373.71B

EPS

SENS:

-$2.00

KO:

$3.32

PS Ratio

SENS:

5.45

KO:

7.47

PB Ratio

SENS:

6.97

KO:

10.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

SENS:

$42.36M

KO:

$50.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SENS:

$22.03M

KO:

$31.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

SENS:

-$72.86M

KO:

$19.57B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SENS vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SENS
SENS Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SENS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SENS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SENS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SENS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SENS Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

KO
KO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
KO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
KO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
KO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SENS vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SENSKODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.29

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

3.79

-4.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

8.26

-9.46

SENS vs. KO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SENS Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the KO Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SENS and KO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SENS vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENS drawdown since its inception was -95.39%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENS and KO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SENSKODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.39%

-68.23%

-27.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.99%

-7.87%

-49.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.45%

-15.50%

-65.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.00%

-17.27%

-76.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.39%

-36.99%

-58.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.04%

-2.49%

-92.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.02%

-16.06%

-47.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.85%

3.61%

+35.24%

Volatility

SENS vs. KO - Volatility Comparison

Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS) has a higher volatility of 11.73% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 8.55%. This indicates that SENS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SENSKODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.73%

8.55%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.05%

14.99%

+40.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.19%

18.62%

+55.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.10%

16.65%

+72.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.33%

18.43%

+74.90%

Dividends

SENS vs. KO - Dividend Comparison

SENS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
2.39%2.92%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%
SENS
Senseonics Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SENS vs. KO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Senseonics Holdings, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SENS and KO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SENS has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to KO (8.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SENS dropped -95.39% vs KO's -68.23%.

KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SENS and KO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer