SENS vs. WBD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS) and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD).

Performance

SENS vs. WBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS) and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SENS vs. WBD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SENS Senseonics Holdings, Inc.	20.47%	-47.27%	-8.19%	-44.65%	-61.42%	206.26%	-4.83%	-64.63%	-2.63%	-0.37%
WBD Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.	-4.61%	172.66%	-7.12%	20.04%	-59.73%	-21.77%	-8.09%	32.34%	10.55%	-18.35%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SENS : $277.49M WBD : $69.55B
EPS SENS : -$1.78 WBD : $1.01
PS Ratio SENS : 7.32 WBD : 1.84
PB Ratio SENS : 4.55 WBD : 1.94
Total Revenue (TTM) SENS : $35.26M WBD : $37.30B
Gross Profit (TTM) SENS : $15.76M WBD : $16.41B
EBITDA (TTM) SENS : -$62.31M WBD : $15.03B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SENS achieves a 20.47% return, which is significantly higher than WBD's -4.61% return. Over the past 10 years, SENS has underperformed WBD with an annualized return of -19.53%, while WBD has yielded a comparatively higher -0.50% annualized return.

SENS

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -20.17%
• YTD: 20.47%
• 6M: -19.47%
• 1Y: -49.99%
• 3Y*: -22.34%
• 5Y*: -33.62%
• 10Y*: -19.53%

WBD

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -3.54%
• YTD: -4.61%
• 6M: 42.07%
• 1Y: 169.25%
• 3Y*: 22.10%
• 5Y*: -8.69%
• 10Y*: -0.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SENS vs. WBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SENS

SENS Risk / Return Rank: 15
SENS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
SENS Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
SENS Omega Ratio Rank: 14
SENS Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
SENS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

WBD

WBD Risk / Return Rank: 96
WBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
WBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
WBD Omega Ratio Rank: 96
WBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
WBD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SENS vs. WBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS) and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SENS	WBD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	2.94	-3.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.84	3.76	-4.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.57	-0.67
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	5.75	-6.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.09	16.30	-17.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SENS vs. WBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SENS Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the WBD Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SENS and WBD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SENS	WBD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.69	2.94	-3.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.37	-0.16	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.21	-0.01	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.22	0.08	-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between SENS and WBD is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SENS vs. WBD - Dividend Comparison

Neither SENS nor WBD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SENS vs. WBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENS drawdown since its inception was -95.17%, roughly equal to the maximum WBD drawdown of -92.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENS and WBD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SENS	WBD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.17%	-92.58%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.86%	-27.18%	-38.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.86%	-84.54%	-9.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.17%	-91.32%	-3.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.69%	-69.61%	-24.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.04%	-46.34%	-16.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.05%	9.59%	+35.46%

Volatility

SENS vs. WBD - Volatility Comparison

Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS) has a higher volatility of 22.78% compared to Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD) at 3.45%. This indicates that SENS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SENS	WBD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.78%	3.45%	+19.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.37%	21.86%	+37.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.79%	58.09%	+14.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.30%	53.32%	+38.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.81%	47.30%	+45.51%

Financials