SEMY vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SEMY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductors ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEMY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

SEMY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductors ETF (SEMY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMY achieves a 39.87% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 5.13% return.

SEMY

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 5.93%
• YTD: 39.87%
• 6M: 34.83%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 5.13%
• 6M: 5.28%
• 1Y: 12.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SEMY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductors ETF	39.87%	-0.24%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.13%	2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMY and OMAH is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

SEMY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 54
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductors ETF (SEMY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEMY	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.30	0.74	+2.57

Drawdowns

SEMY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMY drawdown since its inception was -11.46%, roughly equal to the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMY and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEMY	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.46%	-11.83%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.12%	+2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.58%	-1.26%	-1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.22%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SEMY	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.21%	8.06%	+18.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.21%	13.20%	+13.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.21%	13.20%	+13.01%

SEMY vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEMY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

SEMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.03%, more than OMAH's 15.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.36%	12.86%
SEMY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductors ETF	82.03%	17.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEMY and OMAH in my portfolio?

SEMY and OMAH have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SEMY or OMAH?

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEMY or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SEMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEMY or OMAH?

SEMY has the higher dividend yield at 82.03%, compared with 15.36% for OMAH.

What is the main difference between SEMY and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SEMY and 0.95% for OMAH.