PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEMVX vs. FPADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEMVX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq A (SEMVX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMVX achieves a 19.04% return, which is significantly higher than FPADX's 16.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMVX has outperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 9.69%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.35% annualized return.


SEMVX

1D
4.68%
1M
-4.78%
6M
8.74%
YTD
19.04%
1Y
45.48%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
9.69%
ALL TIME*
5.90%

FPADX

1D
3.98%
1M
-3.45%
6M
7.70%
YTD
16.52%
1Y
34.32%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
8.35%
ALL TIME*
5.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SEMVX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEMVX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq A
19.04%39.88%7.36%8.61%-22.55%-5.37%23.24%21.85%-15.78%40.54%
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
16.52%33.90%6.80%9.51%-20.06%-3.07%17.84%18.28%-14.65%35.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMVX and FPADX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.96

The correlation between SEMVX and FPADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEMVX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEMVX
SEMVX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SEMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FPADX
FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEMVX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq A (SEMVX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEMVXFPADXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.34

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.63

7.44

+1.19

SEMVX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMVX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEMVX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMVX drawdown since its inception was -65.19%, which is greater than FPADX's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMVX and FPADX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEMVXFPADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.19%

-39.16%

-26.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.44%

-13.83%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.77%

-16.09%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.91%

-34.43%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.77%

-39.16%

-3.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.53%

-10.40%

-2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.68%

-13.18%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

4.33%

+0.61%

Volatility

SEMVX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq A (SEMVX) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) at 9.49%. This indicates that SEMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEMVXFPADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.40%

9.49%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.06%

20.91%

+3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.16%

22.72%

+3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.59%

18.12%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

18.25%

+1.04%

SEMVX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMVX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEMVX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

SEMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than FPADX's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
2.02%2.35%2.70%2.68%2.47%2.14%1.50%2.59%2.20%0.12%1.69%2.47%
SEMVX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq A
0.76%0.90%1.00%1.31%1.55%0.16%0.87%1.98%0.99%0.59%0.71%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SEMVX and FPADX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SEMVX has higher volatility (11.40%) compared to FPADX (9.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEMVX dropped -65.19% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

SEMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEMVX and FPADX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer