SEMNX vs. HUBBX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SEMNX (Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I) and HUBBX (Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund) are both mutual funds - SEMNX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Hartford, while HUBBX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Hartford. Over the past 10 years, SEMNX returned 9.97%/yr vs 2.04%/yr for HUBBX. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SEMNX charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for HUBBX.

Performance

SEMNX vs. HUBBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) and Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund (HUBBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMNX achieves a 19.30% return, which is significantly higher than HUBBX's 1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMNX has outperformed HUBBX with an annualized return of 9.97%, while HUBBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.04% annualized return.

SEMNX

• 1D: 4.70%
• 1M: -4.73%
• 6M: 8.95%
• YTD: 19.30%
• 1Y: 46.00%
• 3Y*: 20.34%
• 5Y*: 7.44%
• 10Y*: 9.97%
• ALL TIME*: 6.15%

HUBBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.10%
• 6M: 1.06%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 1Y: 3.05%
• 3Y*: 4.37%
• 5Y*: 2.94%
• 10Y*: 2.04%
• ALL TIME*: 1.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HUBBX Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SEMNX Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SEMNX vs. HUBBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SEMNX Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I	19.30%	40.36%	7.56%	8.80%	-22.30%	-5.11%	23.58%	22.12%	-15.57%	40.87%
HUBBX Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	1.36%	4.32%	4.91%	4.98%	-0.50%	-0.46%	1.27%	2.55%	1.27%	0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMNX and HUBBX is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013	0.02

Return for Risk

SEMNX vs. HUBBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEMNX

SEMNX Risk / Return Rank: 71
SEMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SEMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SEMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
SEMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SEMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

HUBBX

HUBBX Risk / Return Rank: 99
HUBBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
HUBBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
HUBBX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
HUBBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
HUBBX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEMNX vs. HUBBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) and Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund (HUBBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEMNX	HUBBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	3.97	-2.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	7.27	-5.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	2.58	-1.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	11.29	-8.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.75	55.39	-46.64

SEMNX vs. HUBBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the HUBBX Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMNX and HUBBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEMNX vs. HUBBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMNX drawdown since its inception was -65.10%, which is greater than HUBBX's maximum drawdown of -2.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMNX and HUBBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEMNX	HUBBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.10%	-2.53%	-62.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.43%	-0.29%	-16.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.67%	-0.29%	-16.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.78%	-1.70%	-36.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.47%	-2.53%	-39.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.50%	0.00%	-12.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.17%	-0.20%	-16.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	0.06%	+4.87%

Volatility

SEMNX vs. HUBBX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund (HUBBX) at 0.27%. This indicates that SEMNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUBBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEMNX	HUBBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.43%	0.27%	+11.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.10%	0.63%	+23.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.19%	0.82%	+25.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.59%	0.90%	+18.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.30%	0.80%	+18.50%

SEMNX vs. HUBBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMNX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than HUBBX's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEMNX vs. HUBBX - Dividend Comparison

SEMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than HUBBX's 4.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HUBBX Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	4.88%	4.95%	4.14%	1.00%	0.00%	0.54%	2.17%	1.63%	0.86%	0.50%	0.14%	0.00%
SEMNX Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I	1.32%	1.58%	1.16%	1.33%	1.86%	1.21%	0.77%	2.17%	1.22%	0.82%	0.94%	0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEMNX and HUBBX in my portfolio?

SEMNX and HUBBX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEMNX or HUBBX?

SEMNX has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to HUBBX (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEMNX dropped -65.10% vs HUBBX's -2.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HUBBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.97 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.