HUBBX vs. NUSIX
HUBBX (Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund) and NUSIX (Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, HUBBX returned 2.84%/yr vs 3.68%/yr for NUSIX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HUBBX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for NUSIX.
Performance
HUBBX vs. NUSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUBBX achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than NUSIX's 1.56% return.
HUBBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.84%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
NUSIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- —
HUBBX vs. NUSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBBX Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund | 0.97% | 4.32% | 4.91% | 4.98% | -0.50% | -0.46% | 1.27% | 1.44% |
NUSIX Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund | 1.56% | 4.63% | 5.54% | 5.64% | 1.14% | 0.36% | 1.49% | 1.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUBBX and NUSIX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUBBX vs. NUSIX — Risk / Return Rank
HUBBX
NUSIX
HUBBX vs. NUSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund (HUBBX) and Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (NUSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUBBX | NUSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -20.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.81 | 18.90 | -16.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.29 | 43.25 | -30.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 60.34 | 337.91 | -277.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUBBX | NUSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.32 | 6.91 | -2.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.21 | 4.83 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.17 | 3.74 | -1.56 |
Drawdowns
HUBBX vs. NUSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUBBX drawdown since its inception was -2.53%, smaller than the maximum NUSIX drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBBX and NUSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUBBX | NUSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.53% | -2.69% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.29% | -0.10% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.29% | -0.10% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.76% | -0.80% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -2.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.20% | -0.08% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.01% | +0.05% |
Volatility
HUBBX vs. NUSIX - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund (HUBBX) has a higher volatility of 0.24% compared to Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (NUSIX) at 0.18%. This indicates that HUBBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUBBX | NUSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.24% | 0.18% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.62% | 0.43% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82% | 0.63% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.89% | 0.77% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.80% | 0.83% | -0.03% |
HUBBX vs. NUSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUBBX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than NUSIX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUBBX vs. NUSIX - Dividend Comparison
HUBBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than NUSIX's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBBX Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund | 4.90% | 4.95% | 4.14% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 2.17% | 1.63% | 0.86% | 0.50% | 0.14% |
NUSIX Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund | 4.16% | 4.25% | 5.23% | 4.92% | 1.74% | 0.66% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUBBX and NUSIX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUBBX has higher volatility (0.24%) compared to NUSIX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBBX dropped -2.53% vs NUSIX's -2.69%.
NUSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.91 vs 4.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUBBX and NUSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer