SEMNX vs. FEMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX).
SEMNX is managed by Hartford. FEMSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 9, 2008.
Performance
SEMNX vs. FEMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SEMNX vs. FEMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMNX Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I | 3.88% | 40.36% | 7.56% | 8.80% | -22.30% | -5.11% | 23.58% | 22.12% | -15.57% | 40.87% |
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 5.44% | 37.92% | 7.84% | 14.23% | -23.95% | -5.14% | 24.72% | 28.87% | -16.20% | 49.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEMNX achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly lower than FEMSX's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMNX has underperformed FEMSX with an annualized return of 9.33%, while FEMSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.88% annualized return.
SEMNX
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -10.31%
- YTD
- 3.88%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 41.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
FEMSX
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 38.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEMNX vs. FEMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEMNX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SEMNX vs. FEMSX — Risk / Return Rank
SEMNX
FEMSX
SEMNX vs. FEMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEMNX | FEMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.16 | 2.08 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | 2.68 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.40 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 2.89 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.39 | 11.41 | -0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEMNX | FEMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.08 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.23 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.57 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.50 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between SEMNX and FEMSX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SEMNX vs. FEMSX - Dividend Comparison
SEMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than FEMSX's 2.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMNX Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I | 1.52% | 1.58% | 1.16% | 1.33% | 1.86% | 1.21% | 0.77% | 2.17% | 1.22% | 0.82% | 0.94% | 0.94% |
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 2.32% | 2.45% | 2.08% | 2.82% | 2.39% | 12.83% | 2.99% | 2.48% | 9.42% | 8.98% | 1.46% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
SEMNX vs. FEMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEMNX drawdown since its inception was -65.10%, which is greater than FEMSX's maximum drawdown of -44.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMNX and FEMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEMNX | FEMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.10% | -44.16% | -20.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.80% | -13.42% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.74% | -41.64% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | -44.16% | +1.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.22% | -10.35% | -1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.39% | -13.52% | -3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 3.40% | +0.22% |
Volatility
SEMNX vs. FEMSX - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) have volatilities of 10.25% and 10.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SEMNX | FEMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.25% | 10.41% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.23% | 14.73% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.54% | 19.16% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 18.65% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 19.13% | -0.76% |