PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEMI vs. EQIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEMI vs. EQIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) and Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMI achieves a 32.72% return, which is significantly higher than EQIN's 8.44% return.


SEMI

1D
1.77%
1M
16.66%
YTD
32.72%
6M
31.75%
1Y
67.04%
3Y*
30.48%
5Y*
10Y*

EQIN

1D
0.43%
1M
1.50%
YTD
8.44%
6M
10.80%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMI vs. EQIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SEMI
Columbia Select Technology ETF
32.72%24.91%15.87%45.37%-21.87%
EQIN
Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF
8.44%9.37%13.82%11.58%-3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMI and EQIN is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2022

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between SEMI and EQIN has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SEMI vs. EQIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SEMI
EQIN

Technology

82.3%
9.7%

Communication Services

9.5%
6.2%

Financial Services

4.4%
27.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
7.8%

Basic Materials

-

2.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

11.7%

Energy

-

13.3%

Healthcare

-

5.1%

Industrials

-

13.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.7%

Technology

SEMI
82.3%
EQIN
9.7%

Communication Services

SEMI
9.5%
EQIN
6.2%

Financial Services

SEMI
4.4%
EQIN
27.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SEMI
3.9%
EQIN
7.8%

Basic Materials

SEMI

-

EQIN
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

SEMI

-

EQIN
11.7%

Energy

SEMI

-

EQIN
13.3%

Healthcare

SEMI

-

EQIN
5.1%

Industrials

SEMI

-

EQIN
13.1%

Real Estate

SEMI

-

EQIN

-

Utilities

SEMI

-

EQIN
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEMI vs. EQIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMI
SEMI Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SEMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMI Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

EQIN
EQIN Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EQIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EQIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQIN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMI vs. EQIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) and Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEMIEQINDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.05

1.82

+1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.69

2.67

+1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.32

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.77

3.43

+1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.95

10.23

+7.71

SEMI vs. EQIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMI Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is higher than the EQIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMI and EQIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEMIEQINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

1.82

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.66

-0.01

Drawdowns

SEMI vs. EQIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMI drawdown since its inception was -32.93%, smaller than the maximum EQIN drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMI and EQIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEMIEQINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.93%

-42.16%

+9.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.41%

-5.41%

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.93%

-12.05%

-20.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.29%

-4.90%

-4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

1.81%

+2.02%

Volatility

SEMI vs. EQIN - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN) at 2.59%. This indicates that SEMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEMIEQINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

2.59%

+4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.41%

7.64%

+9.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.14%

10.31%

+11.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.59%

14.67%

+16.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.59%

18.64%

+12.95%

SEMI vs. EQIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EQIN's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEMI vs. EQIN - Dividend Comparison

SEMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than EQIN's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EQIN
Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF
1.90%2.05%4.34%2.41%2.71%2.57%2.54%2.70%7.81%11.52%2.44%
SEMI
Columbia Select Technology ETF
3.38%4.48%0.96%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEMI and EQIN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEMI has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to EQIN (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEMI dropped -32.93% vs EQIN's -42.16%.

On 3-year performance, SEMI leads with 30.48% vs 15.09% for EQIN. On fees, EQIN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EQIN has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SEMI has performed better with a 30.48% return vs 15.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EQIN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SEMI.

SEMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 1.90% for EQIN.

SEMI is categorized as Semiconductors, while EQIN is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SEMI and 0.35% for EQIN.

SEMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEMI and EQIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer