SEMG vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SEMG (Suncoast Select Growth ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SEMG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

SEMG vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Suncoast Select Growth ETF (SEMG) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SEMG

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 2.69%
• YTD: -2.15%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: 3.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMG vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SEMG Suncoast Select Growth ETF	0.05%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMG and GRW is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.60

SEMG vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SEMG	GRW
Technology	39.1%	26.6%
Communication Services	19.1%	9.1%
Financial Services	17.5%	9.8%
Healthcare	13.2%	4.1%
Industrials	6.7%	38.1%
Consumer Cyclical	4.5%	8.3%
Basic Materials	-	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SEMG vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMG

SEMG Risk / Return Rank: 13
SEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
SEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
SEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 13
SEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
SEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMG vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Suncoast Select Growth ETF (SEMG) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SEMG	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.80	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEMG	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	13.58	-13.15

Drawdowns

SEMG vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMG drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMG and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEMG	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-0.45%	-15.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.13%	-0.27%	-2.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.35%	-0.17%	-3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SEMG	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.91%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.05%	8.89%	+4.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.00%	8.89%	+4.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.00%	8.89%	+4.11%

SEMG vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEMG vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

SEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SEMG Suncoast Select Growth ETF	0.05%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEMG and GRW in my portfolio?

SEMG and GRW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SEMG or GRW?

On fees, SEMG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEMG or GRW?

SEMG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEMG or GRW?

SEMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between SEMG and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Suncoast and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEMG and 0.75% for GRW.