SEMG vs. EDGH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SEMG (Suncoast Select Growth ETF) and EDGH (3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEMG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Suncoast, while EDGH is a Commodities fund actively managed by 3EDGE Asset Management. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SEMG returned 3.68% vs 31.24% for EDGH. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. SEMG charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for EDGH.

Performance

SEMG vs. EDGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Suncoast Select Growth ETF (SEMG) and 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMG achieves a -2.89% return, which is significantly lower than EDGH's 12.49% return.

SEMG

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: -2.89%
• 6M: -1.44%
• 1Y: 3.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EDGH

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -1.84%
• YTD: 12.49%
• 6M: 14.30%
• 1Y: 31.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMG vs. EDGH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SEMG Suncoast Select Growth ETF	-2.89%	8.27%
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF	12.49%	19.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMG and EDGH is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025	-0.00

SEMG vs. EDGH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SEMG	EDGH
Technology	39.1%	-
Communication Services	19.1%	-
Financial Services	17.5%	92.7%
Healthcare	13.2%	-
Industrials	6.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SEMG vs. EDGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMG

SEMG Risk / Return Rank: 13
SEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
SEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
SEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 12
SEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
SEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 13

EDGH

EDGH Risk / Return Rank: 54
EDGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
EDGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
EDGH Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EDGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EDGH Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMG vs. EDGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Suncoast Select Growth ETF (SEMG) and 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SEMG	EDGH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.28	1.77	-1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.48	2.15	-1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.36	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	2.96	-2.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.75	9.70	-8.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEMG vs. EDGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMG Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the EDGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMG and EDGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEMG	EDGH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28	1.77	-1.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	1.53	-1.15

Drawdowns

SEMG vs. EDGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMG drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, which is greater than EDGH's maximum drawdown of -10.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMG and EDGH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEMG	EDGH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-10.60%	-5.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.80%	-10.60%	-5.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.86%	-4.80%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-2.04%	-1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	3.23%	+1.70%

Volatility

SEMG vs. EDGH - Volatility Comparison

Suncoast Select Growth ETF (SEMG) and 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) have volatilities of 3.14% and 3.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEMG	EDGH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	3.01%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.89%	14.72%	-4.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.04%	17.72%	-4.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.00%	15.60%	-2.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.00%	15.60%	-2.60%

SEMG vs. EDGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EDGH's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEMG vs. EDGH - Dividend Comparison

SEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than EDGH's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF	1.05%	1.18%	3.19%
SEMG Suncoast Select Growth ETF	0.05%	0.05%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEMG and EDGH in my portfolio?

SEMG and EDGH have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEMG or EDGH?

SEMG has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to EDGH (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEMG dropped -15.80% vs EDGH's -10.60%.

Which ETF is better, SEMG or EDGH?

On 1-year performance, EDGH leads with 31.24% vs 3.68% for SEMG. On fees, SEMG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EDGH has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEMG or EDGH?

Over the 1-year period, EDGH has performed better with a 31.24% return vs 3.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEMG or EDGH?

SEMG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EDGH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEMG or EDGH?

EDGH has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.05% for SEMG.

What is the main difference between SEMG and EDGH?

SEMG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EDGH is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Suncoast and 3EDGE Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEMG and 1.01% for EDGH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.