PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEMC.L vs. JMBP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEMC.L vs. JMBP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SEMC.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SEMC.L is traded in GBp, while JMBP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JMBP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMC.L achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly higher than JMBP.L's 1.62% return.


SEMC.L

1D
0.03%
1M
1.31%
YTD
2.30%
6M
2.17%
1Y
9.29%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*

JMBP.L

1D
0.24%
1M
1.00%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.99%
1Y
10.82%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMC.L vs. JMBP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SEMC.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.30%2.50%9.09%2.06%0.58%1.54%-0.46%0.85%
JMBP.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist)
1.62%13.12%1.60%8.37%-17.57%-2.86%3.66%2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMC.L and JMBP.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2019

-0.02

The correlation between SEMC.L and JMBP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEMC.L vs. JMBP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMC.L
SEMC.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SEMC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

JMBP.L
JMBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JMBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMC.L vs. JMBP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SEMC.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEMC.LJMBP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.38

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

10.19

-2.30

SEMC.L vs. JMBP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the JMBP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMC.L and JMBP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEMC.LJMBP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.99

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.09

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.11

+0.24

Drawdowns

SEMC.L vs. JMBP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMC.L drawdown since its inception was -12.52%, smaller than the maximum JMBP.L drawdown of -27.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMC.L and JMBP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEMC.LJMBP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.52%

-27.19%

+14.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-4.52%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.69%

-7.61%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.89%

-26.88%

+14.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.08%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-9.99%

+5.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.06%

+0.12%

Volatility

SEMC.L vs. JMBP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SEMC.L) is 1.50%, while JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) has a volatility of 1.96%. This indicates that SEMC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMBP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEMC.LJMBP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.96%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.15%

4.53%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.74%

5.44%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.61%

8.49%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.18%

10.58%

-2.40%

SEMC.L vs. JMBP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMC.L has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than JMBP.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEMC.L vs. JMBP.L - Dividend Comparison

SEMC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, which matches JMBP.L's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JMBP.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist)
5.75%5.61%5.83%5.24%5.16%3.70%4.42%0.00%0.00%
SEMC.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
5.78%6.51%5.02%5.04%3.98%3.97%4.77%5.18%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEMC.L and JMBP.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JMBP.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JMBP.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for SEMC.L.

SEMC.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while JMBP.L tracks JP Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond (GBP Hedged). They also come from different issuers: UBS and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for SEMC.L and 0.39% for JMBP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEMC.L and JMBP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer