PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEMAX vs. SHGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEMAX vs. SHGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Massachusetts Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (SEMAX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMAX achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than SHGTX's 58.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMAX has underperformed SHGTX with an annualized return of 1.64%, while SHGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.87% annualized return.


SEMAX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.51%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
3.63%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
1.64%

SHGTX

1D
3.58%
1M
16.12%
YTD
58.37%
6M
55.67%
1Y
121.45%
3Y*
46.55%
5Y*
26.25%
10Y*
27.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMAX vs. SHGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEMAX
Columbia Massachusetts Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
1.07%5.25%1.71%4.23%-7.73%0.98%3.59%6.68%0.46%3.77%
SHGTX
Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund
58.37%35.09%26.04%45.28%-31.70%38.60%45.56%54.92%-8.70%34.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMAX and SHGTX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 1994

-0.06

The correlation between SEMAX and SHGTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEMAX vs. SHGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMAX
SEMAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SEMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SHGTX
SHGTX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SHGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SHGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMAX vs. SHGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Massachusetts Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (SEMAX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEMAXSHGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

1.69

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

10.16

-7.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.68

38.70

-30.02

SEMAX vs. SHGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is lower than the SHGTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMAX and SHGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEMAXSHGTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01

4.85

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.96

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

1.04

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.66

+0.40

Drawdowns

SEMAX vs. SHGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMAX drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, smaller than the maximum SHGTX drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMAX and SHGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEMAXSHGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-77.47%

+65.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.23%

-12.45%

+10.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.46%

-28.90%

+25.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.75%

-43.17%

+31.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.75%

-43.17%

+31.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

0.00%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.66%

-24.94%

+23.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

3.26%

-2.59%

Volatility

SEMAX vs. SHGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Massachusetts Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (SEMAX) is 0.70%, while Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that SEMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEMAXSHGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

7.24%

-6.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.52%

20.14%

-18.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94%

26.07%

-24.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.83%

27.43%

-24.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.33%

26.79%

-23.46%

SEMAX vs. SHGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMAX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than SHGTX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEMAX vs. SHGTX - Dividend Comparison

SEMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than SHGTX's 5.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEMAX
Columbia Massachusetts Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
2.81%3.71%2.74%2.45%2.31%2.40%2.38%3.19%3.05%2.95%3.80%3.17%
SHGTX
Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund
5.33%8.45%14.04%6.22%3.94%11.77%9.92%10.26%12.75%7.25%8.13%8.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEMAX and SHGTX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHGTX has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to SEMAX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEMAX dropped -11.75% vs SHGTX's -77.47%.

SHGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.85 vs 3.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEMAX and SHGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer