PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SEMA.L vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SEMA.L vs. MOAT

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

SEMA.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEMA.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEMA.L returned 10.44%/yr vs 14.32%/yr for MOAT. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEMA.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.

Performance

SEMA.L vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SEMA.L is traded in GBp, while MOAT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MOAT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMA.L achieves a 21.24% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMA.L has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 10.44%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.32% annualized return.

SEMA.L

1D
-3.81%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
21.24%
6M
21.93%
1Y
46.61%
3Y*
19.04%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
10.44%

MOAT

1D
-0.77%
1M
2.02%
YTD
-0.47%
6M
-1.73%
1Y
15.07%
3Y*
8.40%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
14.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMA.L vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)		21.24%25.09%9.38%3.47%-10.74%-1.60%14.69%12.62%-9.25%24.43%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF		-0.47%5.13%12.67%25.29%-3.39%25.29%11.47%29.67%4.57%12.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMA.L and MOAT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012

0.45

The correlation between SEMA.L and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SEMA.L vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SEMA.L
MOAT

Technology

42.9%
32.8%

Financial Services

17.8%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
10.3%

Industrials

6.8%
13.5%

Communication Services

6.2%
2.4%

Basic Materials

5.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
17.5%

Healthcare

2.6%
16.0%

Utilities

1.9%

-

Real Estate

1.0%
0.8%

Technology

SEMA.L
42.9%
MOAT
32.8%

Financial Services

SEMA.L
17.8%
MOAT
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SEMA.L
8.6%
MOAT
10.3%

Industrials

SEMA.L
6.8%
MOAT
13.5%

Communication Services

SEMA.L
6.2%
MOAT
2.4%

Basic Materials

SEMA.L
5.9%
MOAT

-

Energy

SEMA.L
3.5%
MOAT

-

Consumer Defensive

SEMA.L
2.7%
MOAT
17.5%

Healthcare

SEMA.L
2.6%
MOAT
16.0%

Utilities

SEMA.L
1.9%
MOAT

-

Real Estate

SEMA.L
1.0%
MOAT
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF

Often compared with SEMA.L:
SEMA.L vs. EMIM.LSEMA.L vs. EIMI.LSEMA.L vs. VFEG.LSEMA.L vs. VWRA.LSEMA.L vs. SWRD.MISEMA.L vs. EQQQ.LSEMA.L vs. EDIV
Often compared with MOAT:
MOAT vs. SPYMOAT vs. VOOMOAT vs. BRK-AMOAT vs. SCHDMOAT vs. IVVMOAT vs. VTIMOAT vs. IOO

Return for Risk

SEMA.L vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SEMA.L
SEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMA.L vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SEMA.LMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.68
1.26

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.43
1.83

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.21

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

1.43

+2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.07

3.92

+11.15

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEMA.L vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMA.L and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SEMA.LMOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

1.26

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.55

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.78

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.86

-0.77

Drawdowns

SEMA.L vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMA.L drawdown since its inception was -46.27%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -25.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMA.L and MOAT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SEMA.LMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.27%

-25.85%

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-11.63%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.90%

-22.90%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

-22.90%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.06%

-25.85%

-1.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-4.92%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-3.65%

-15.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

4.25%

-1.14%

Volatility

SEMA.L vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 3.57%. This indicates that SEMA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SEMA.LMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.00%

3.57%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.11%

9.57%

+5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.44%

13.32%

+4.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.11%

16.80%

+4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.33%

18.46%

+1.87%

SEMA.L vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMA.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEMA.L vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

SEMA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF		1.38%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SEMA.L and MOAT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SEMA.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SEMA.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

SEMA.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. SEMA.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SEMA.L and 0.47% for MOAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEMA.L and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer