SEMA.L vs. MEUD.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SEMA.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)) and MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SEMA.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while MEUD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEMA.L returned 10.61%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for MEUD.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SEMA.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MEUD.L.

Performance

SEMA.L vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMA.L achieves a 27.12% return, which is significantly higher than MEUD.L's 8.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SEMA.L having a 10.61% annualized return and MEUD.L not far ahead at 11.00%.

SEMA.L

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 2.23%
• YTD: 27.12%
• 6M: 28.67%
• 1Y: 49.82%
• 3Y*: 22.03%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: 10.61%

MEUD.L

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 8.91%
• 6M: 9.35%
• 1Y: 23.65%
• 3Y*: 15.66%
• 5Y*: 10.07%
• 10Y*: 11.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMA.L vs. MEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SEMA.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)	27.12%	25.09%	9.38%	3.47%	-10.74%	-1.60%	14.69%	12.62%	-9.25%	24.43%
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc	8.91%	26.51%	3.65%	13.48%	-5.04%	17.06%	3.85%	20.40%	-9.59%	15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMA.L and MEUD.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2013	0.67

The correlation between SEMA.L and MEUD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SEMA.L vs. MEUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SEMA.L	MEUD.L
Technology	44.9%	9.7%
Financial Services	18.3%	24.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	7.2%
Industrials	6.5%	20.1%
Communication Services	6.0%	2.9%
Basic Materials	5.7%	5.0%
Energy	3.2%	5.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	7.6%
Healthcare	2.3%	12.3%
Utilities	1.8%	4.4%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.2%

Return for Risk

SEMA.L vs. MEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMA.L

SEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
SEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
SEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

MEUD.L

MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMA.L vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEMA.L	MEUD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	1.94	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	2.71	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.37	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.53	2.24	+2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.27	8.12	+7.15

SEMA.L vs. MEUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMA.L and MEUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEMA.L vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMA.L drawdown since its inception was -46.27%, which is greater than MEUD.L's maximum drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMA.L and MEUD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEMA.L	MEUD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.27%	-28.57%	-17.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.95%	-10.53%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.90%	-12.61%	-10.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.52%	-17.09%	-6.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.06%	-28.57%	+1.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.94%	-0.35%	-3.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.58%	-6.88%	-12.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	2.91%	+0.34%

Volatility

SEMA.L vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) at 3.06%. This indicates that SEMA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEMA.L	MEUD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.83%	3.06%	+5.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.44%	10.37%	+6.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.53%	12.20%	+6.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.34%	16.01%	+5.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.41%	16.91%	+3.50%

SEMA.L vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMA.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than MEUD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SEMA.L vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEMA.L nor MEUD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEMA.L and MEUD.L in my portfolio?

SEMA.L and MEUD.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SEMA.L or MEUD.L?

On fees, MEUD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEMA.L or MEUD.L?

MEUD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for SEMA.L.

What is the main difference between SEMA.L and MEUD.L?

SEMA.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while MEUD.L is Europe Equities. SEMA.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SEMA.L and 0.15% for MEUD.L.