PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SEMA.L vs. IPRP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SEMA.L vs. IPRP.L

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

SEMA.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IPRP.L (iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEMA.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while IPRP.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEMA.L returned 10.44%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for IPRP.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEMA.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IPRP.L.

Performance

SEMA.L vs. IPRP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) and iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMA.L achieves a 21.24% return, which is significantly higher than IPRP.L's -1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMA.L has outperformed IPRP.L with an annualized return of 10.44%, while IPRP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.38% annualized return.

SEMA.L

1D
-3.81%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
21.24%
6M
21.93%
1Y
46.61%
3Y*
19.04%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
10.44%

IPRP.L

1D
-1.16%
1M
-2.58%
YTD
-1.60%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
-0.13%
3Y*
10.37%
5Y*
-4.25%
10Y*
1.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMA.L vs. IPRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)		21.24%25.09%9.38%3.47%-10.74%-1.60%14.69%12.62%-9.25%24.43%
IPRP.L
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF		-1.60%13.63%-4.96%15.42%-33.74%1.88%-3.84%18.45%-5.36%19.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMA.L and IPRP.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between SEMA.L and IPRP.L has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SEMA.L vs. IPRP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SEMA.L
IPRP.L

Technology

42.9%

-

Financial Services

17.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%

-

Industrials

6.8%

-

Communication Services

6.2%

-

Basic Materials

5.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.7%

-

Healthcare

2.6%

-

Utilities

1.9%

-

Real Estate

1.0%
100.0%

Technology

SEMA.L
42.9%
IPRP.L

-

Financial Services

SEMA.L
17.8%
IPRP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SEMA.L
8.6%
IPRP.L

-

Industrials

SEMA.L
6.8%
IPRP.L

-

Communication Services

SEMA.L
6.2%
IPRP.L

-

Basic Materials

SEMA.L
5.9%
IPRP.L

-

Energy

SEMA.L
3.5%
IPRP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SEMA.L
2.7%
IPRP.L

-

Healthcare

SEMA.L
2.6%
IPRP.L

-

Utilities

SEMA.L
1.9%
IPRP.L

-

Real Estate

SEMA.L
1.0%
IPRP.L
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)

iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF

Often compared with SEMA.L:
SEMA.L vs. EMIM.LSEMA.L vs. EIMI.LSEMA.L vs. VFEG.LSEMA.L vs. VWRA.LSEMA.L vs. SWRD.MISEMA.L vs. EQQQ.LSEMA.L vs. EDIV
Often compared with IPRP.L:
IPRP.L vs. IUSP.LIPRP.L vs. IEUSIPRP.L vs. VNQIPRP.L vs. IDWP.LIPRP.L vs. AYEP.DEIPRP.L vs. XDER.LIPRP.L vs. IJS

Return for Risk

SEMA.L vs. IPRP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SEMA.L
SEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
IPRP.L
IPRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IPRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMA.L vs. IPRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) and iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SEMA.LIPRP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.68
-0.00

+2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.43
0.10

+3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.01

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

-0.00

+4.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.07

-0.01

+15.08

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEMA.L vs. IPRP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the IPRP.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMA.L and IPRP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SEMA.LIPRP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

-0.00

+2.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

-0.20

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.07

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.10

-0.01

Drawdowns

SEMA.L vs. IPRP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMA.L drawdown since its inception was -46.27%, smaller than the maximum IPRP.L drawdown of -64.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMA.L and IPRP.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SEMA.LIPRP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.27%

-64.48%

+18.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-16.12%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.90%

-16.12%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

-48.77%

+25.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.06%

-48.77%

+21.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-25.40%

+19.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-16.65%

-2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

6.00%

-2.89%

Volatility

SEMA.L vs. IPRP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) at 3.97%. This indicates that SEMA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SEMA.LIPRP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.00%

3.97%

+4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.11%

13.07%

+2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.44%

15.20%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.11%

21.54%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.33%

19.35%

+0.98%

SEMA.L vs. IPRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMA.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IPRP.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEMA.L vs. IPRP.L - Dividend Comparison

SEMA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPRP.L
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF		2.89%2.83%2.79%2.62%4.20%2.11%2.68%3.07%3.24%2.81%2.49%2.59%
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SEMA.L and IPRP.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SEMA.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SEMA.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IPRP.L.

SEMA.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IPRP.L is REIT. SEMA.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while IPRP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SEMA.L and 0.40% for IPRP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEMA.L and IPRP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer