SEMA.L vs. HTWD.L
SEMA.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)) and HTWD.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - SEMA.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while HTWD.L tracks the MSCI Taiwan Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEMA.L returned 8.66%/yr vs 20.47%/yr for HTWD.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SEMA.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HTWD.L.
Performance
SEMA.L vs. HTWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SEMA.L is traded in GBp, while HTWD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HTWD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEMA.L achieves a 18.10% return, which is significantly lower than HTWD.L's 58.08% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMA.L has underperformed HTWD.L with an annualized return of 8.66%, while HTWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.47% annualized return.
SEMA.L
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -6.92%
- 6M
- 10.77%
- YTD
- 18.10%
- 1Y
- 34.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
HTWD.L
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -5.26%
- 6M
- 46.74%
- YTD
- 58.08%
- 1Y
- 83.39%
- 3Y*
- 38.87%
- 5Y*
- 20.84%
- 10Y*
- 20.47%
SEMA.L vs. HTWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMA.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) | 18.10% | 25.09% | 9.38% | 3.47% | -10.74% | -1.60% | 14.69% | 12.62% | -9.25% | 24.43% |
HTWD.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 58.08% | 22.83% | 27.59% | 22.54% | -21.01% | 28.99% | 32.61% | 28.48% | -3.30% | 16.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEMA.L and HTWD.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2011 | 0.77 |
The correlation between SEMA.L and HTWD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (5 years) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEMA.L vs. HTWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
SEMA.L
HTWD.L
SEMA.L vs. HTWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HTWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEMA.L | HTWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.51 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 7.17 | -3.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.33 | 21.28 | -11.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEMA.L vs. HTWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEMA.L drawdown since its inception was -46.27%, which is greater than HTWD.L's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMA.L and HTWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEMA.L | HTWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.27% | -32.66% | -13.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -11.57% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.90% | -29.82% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.90% | -30.12% | +7.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.06% | -30.12% | +3.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.75% | -11.57% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.54% | -7.45% | -12.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 3.90% | -0.16% |
Volatility
SEMA.L vs. HTWD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) is 8.95%, while HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HTWD.L) has a volatility of 10.66%. This indicates that SEMA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEMA.L | HTWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.95% | 10.66% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.71% | 22.61% | -4.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.77% | 26.14% | -6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 22.15% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 21.08% | -0.59% |
SEMA.L vs. HTWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEMA.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HTWD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEMA.L vs. HTWD.L - Dividend Comparison
SEMA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTWD.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.18% | 2.73% | 3.31% | 1.13% | 1.69% | 2.08% | 2.79% | 1.37% | 2.64% | 2.65% |
SEMA.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEMA.L and HTWD.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEMA.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEMA.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HTWD.L.
SEMA.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while HTWD.L tracks MSCI Taiwan Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SEMA.L and 0.50% for HTWD.L.
Find the right allocation for SEMA.L and HTWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer