PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SEMA.L vs. CSPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SEMA.L vs. CSPX.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SEMA.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)) and CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SEMA.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while CSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEMA.L returned 10.90%/yr vs 16.07%/yr for CSPX.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SEMA.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSPX.L.

Performance

SEMA.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SEMA.L is traded in GBp, while CSPX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSPX.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMA.L achieves a 26.04% return, which is significantly higher than CSPX.L's 10.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMA.L has underperformed CSPX.L with an annualized return of 10.90%, while CSPX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.07% annualized return.

SEMA.L

1D
-1.41%
1M
6.37%
YTD
26.04%
6M
28.18%
1Y
53.95%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
10.90%

CSPX.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.42%
YTD
10.72%
6M
10.33%
1Y
29.03%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMA.L vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)		26.04%25.09%9.38%3.47%-10.74%-1.60%14.69%12.62%-9.25%24.43%
CSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		10.77%9.09%27.44%20.40%-9.06%30.58%14.17%25.59%0.15%11.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMA.L and CSPX.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010

0.59

The correlation between SEMA.L and CSPX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

SEMA.L vs. CSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SEMA.L
CSPX.L

Technology

41.3%
38.2%

Financial Services

18.2%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
10.0%

Industrials

7.0%
7.9%

Communication Services

6.4%
10.9%

Basic Materials

6.0%
1.7%

Energy

3.6%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
4.7%

Healthcare

2.7%
8.3%

Utilities

2.0%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.9%

Technology

SEMA.L
41.3%
CSPX.L
38.2%

Financial Services

SEMA.L
18.2%
CSPX.L
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SEMA.L
9.0%
CSPX.L
10.0%

Industrials

SEMA.L
7.0%
CSPX.L
7.9%

Communication Services

SEMA.L
6.4%
CSPX.L
10.9%

Basic Materials

SEMA.L
6.0%
CSPX.L
1.7%

Energy

SEMA.L
3.6%
CSPX.L
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

SEMA.L
2.8%
CSPX.L
4.7%

Healthcare

SEMA.L
2.7%
CSPX.L
8.3%

Utilities

SEMA.L
2.0%
CSPX.L
2.2%

Real Estate

SEMA.L
1.1%
CSPX.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with SEMA.L:
SEMA.L vs. EMIM.LSEMA.L vs. EIMI.LSEMA.L vs. VFEG.LSEMA.L vs. VWRA.LSEMA.L vs. SWRD.MISEMA.L vs. EQQQ.LSEMA.L vs. EDIV
Often compared with CSPX.L:
CSPX.L vs. VOOCSPX.L vs. VUAA.LCSPX.L vs. SPYCSPX.L vs. CSPX.ASCSPX.L vs. CSP1.LCSPX.L vs. VWRL.ASCSPX.L vs. IVV

Return for Risk

SEMA.L vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SEMA.L
SEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
CSPX.L
CSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMA.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SEMA.LCSPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.16
2.38

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.05
3.25

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.44

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

3.95

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.45

13.49

+3.97

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEMA.L vs. CSPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMA.L and CSPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SEMA.LCSPX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

2.38

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.97

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.98

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.98

-0.58

Drawdowns

SEMA.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMA.L drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, which is greater than CSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -25.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMA.L and CSPX.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SEMA.LCSPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.75%

-25.99%

-5.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-7.22%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.23%

-21.16%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

-21.16%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.06%

-25.99%

-1.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-0.28%

-2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-3.29%

-7.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.13%

+0.95%

Volatility

SEMA.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 3.49%. This indicates that SEMA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SEMA.LCSPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

3.49%

+3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.56%

8.67%

+5.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.00%

11.99%

+5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

15.39%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

16.37%

+1.68%

SEMA.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMA.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SEMA.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEMA.L nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

SEMA.L and CSPX.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSPX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for SEMA.L.

SEMA.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CSPX.L is S&P 500. SEMA.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while CSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SEMA.L and 0.07% for CSPX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEMA.L and CSPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer