SEIM vs. LEND
SEIM (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF) and LEND (SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEIM is a Momentum fund actively managed by SEI, while LEND is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by SEI. Both are actively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SEIM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LEND.
Performance
SEIM vs. LEND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SEIM
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- 6M
- 12.15%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 26.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.51%
LEND
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.84M | $3.67M | $2.39M | |
| $5.57M | $6.94M | $5.12M |
SEIM vs. LEND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF | 1.98% |
LEND SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF | 0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEIM and LEND is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEIM vs. LEND — Risk / Return Rank
SEIM
LEND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SEIM vs. LEND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF (LEND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEIM | LEND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.72 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEIM vs. LEND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEIM drawdown since its inception was -22.17%, which is greater than LEND's maximum drawdown of -1.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIM and LEND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEIM | LEND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.17% | -1.00% | -21.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.49% | -0.74% | -4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -0.32% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | — | — |
Volatility
SEIM vs. LEND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEIM | LEND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.59% | 3.33% | +15.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 3.33% | +15.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 3.33% | +15.85% |
SEIM vs. LEND - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEIM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LEND's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEIM vs. LEND - Dividend Comparison
SEIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than LEND's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEND SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF | 0.55% | 0.56% | 0.48% | 0.89% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEIM and LEND have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEIM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEIM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEND.
LEND has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.55% for SEIM.
SEIM is categorized as Momentum, while LEND is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIM and 0.65% for LEND.
Find the right allocation for SEIM and LEND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer