PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEIM vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEIM vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIM achieves a 17.37% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.


SEIM

1D
-1.77%
1M
-0.38%
6M
13.68%
YTD
17.37%
1Y
29.35%
3Y*
27.16%
5Y*
10Y*

BITI

1D
2.65%
1M
1.46%
6M
34.68%
YTD
28.75%
1Y
68.34%
3Y*
-30.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIM vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
17.37%20.20%39.12%16.25%5.60%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
28.75%-1.76%-62.60%-66.17%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIM and BITI is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

-0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEIM vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIM
SEIM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SEIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIM Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIM vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEIMBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.72

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.15

6.78

+5.37

SEIM vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIM and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEIM vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIM drawdown since its inception was -22.17%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIM and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEIMBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.17%

-92.16%

+69.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-25.28%

+15.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.17%

-84.63%

+62.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-85.94%

+82.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-68.34%

+64.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

10.11%

-7.69%

Volatility

SEIM vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) is 7.17%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that SEIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEIMBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

11.38%

-4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.97%

34.25%

-19.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.92%

44.14%

-26.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

52.28%

-33.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

52.28%

-33.16%

SEIM vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEIM vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

SEIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.10%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
0.54%0.56%0.48%0.89%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEIM and BITI have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITI has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to SEIM (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIM dropped -22.17% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 3-year performance, SEIM leads with 27.16% vs -30.65% for BITI. On fees, SEIM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIM has been the lower-risk option at 7.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SEIM has performed better with a 27.16% return vs -30.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEIM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 0.54% for SEIM.

SEIM is categorized as Momentum, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: SEI and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIM and 1.03% for BITI.

SEIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEIM and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer