SEIAX vs. GABFX

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

SEIAX (SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A) and GABFX (GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, SEIAX returned 4.28%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for GABFX. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SEIAX charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for GABFX.

Performance

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A (SEIAX) and GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIAX achieves a 8.23% return, which is significantly higher than GABFX's -5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SEIAX has outperformed GABFX with an annualized return of 4.28%, while GABFX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.24% annualized return.

SEIAX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 1.91%
• 6M: 4.16%
• YTD: 8.23%
• 1Y: 11.87%
• 3Y*: 7.46%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: 4.28%
• ALL TIME*: 2.22%

GABFX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -1.52%
• 6M: -4.45%
• YTD: -5.78%
• 1Y: -4.48%
• 3Y*: -0.90%
• 5Y*: -4.13%
• 10Y*: 0.24%
• ALL TIME*: 1.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GABFX GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SEIAX SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SEIAX SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A	8.23%	8.50%	4.74%	-1.01%	9.20%	11.41%	-0.51%	6.33%	-2.93%	-1.12%
GABFX GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund	-5.78%	8.82%	-12.60%	8.33%	-14.86%	1.34%	11.28%	8.00%	0.78%	2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIAX and GABFX is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012	0.13

The correlation between SEIAX and GABFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SEIAX vs. GABFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEIAX

SEIAX Risk / Return Rank: 75
SEIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SEIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
SEIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SEIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
SEIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

GABFX

GABFX Risk / Return Rank: 1
GABFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
GABFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
GABFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
GABFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
GABFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A (SEIAX) and GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEIAX	GABFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	-0.47	+2.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	-0.61	+3.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	0.93	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	-0.43	+3.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.32	-0.91	+10.24

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the GABFX Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIAX and GABFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.97%, smaller than the maximum GABFX drawdown of -27.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIAX and GABFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEIAX	GABFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.97%	-27.84%	+6.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.29%	-10.31%	+6.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.29%	-19.48%	+15.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.67%	-27.49%	+19.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.20%	-27.84%	+14.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.72%	-19.35%	+17.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.04%	-7.41%	+0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	4.81%	-3.55%

Volatility

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A (SEIAX) is 1.75%, while GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that SEIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEIAX	GABFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.75%	2.63%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.88%	6.77%	-1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.70%	9.43%	-3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.67%	14.08%	-8.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.25%	10.41%	-5.16%

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIAX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than GABFX's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Dividend Comparison

SEIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than GABFX's 2.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GABFX GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund	2.92%	2.69%	4.19%	5.03%	0.71%	1.81%	1.20%	4.72%	5.13%	1.07%	0.00%	7.43%
SEIAX SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A	2.71%	2.94%	5.16%	3.77%	13.78%	10.42%	2.34%	2.13%	3.63%	1.57%	1.73%	1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEIAX and GABFX in my portfolio?

SEIAX and GABFX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEIAX or GABFX?

GABFX has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to SEIAX (1.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIAX dropped -20.97% vs GABFX's -27.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.