PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEIAX vs. GABFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A (SEIAX) and GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIAX achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly higher than GABFX's -4.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SEIAX has outperformed GABFX with an annualized return of 4.26%, while GABFX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.46% annualized return.


SEIAX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
8.10%
6M
7.92%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
8.07%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
4.26%

GABFX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
-4.23%
6M
-5.37%
1Y
2.24%
3Y*
-1.65%
5Y*
-3.23%
10Y*
0.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEIAX
SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A
8.10%8.50%4.74%-1.01%9.20%11.41%-0.51%6.33%-2.93%-1.12%
GABFX
GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund
-4.23%8.82%-12.60%8.33%-14.86%1.34%11.28%8.00%0.78%2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIAX and GABFX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.13

The correlation between SEIAX and GABFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEIAX vs. GABFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIAX
SEIAX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SEIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

GABFX
GABFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
GABFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABFX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GABFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A (SEIAX) and GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEIAXGABFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.04

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

0.24

+5.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.48

0.64

+17.84

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the GABFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIAX and GABFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEIAXGABFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

0.21

+2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.16

-0.23

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.04

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.13

+0.32

Drawdowns

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.97%, smaller than the maximum GABFX drawdown of -27.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIAX and GABFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEIAXGABFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.97%

-27.84%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.33%

-9.58%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.31%

-19.48%

+16.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.67%

-27.84%

+20.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.20%

-27.84%

+14.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-18.03%

+16.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-7.30%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

3.52%

-2.83%

Volatility

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A (SEIAX) is 2.06%, while GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that SEIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEIAXGABFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

3.28%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.67%

6.62%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.31%

10.72%

-5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.62%

14.01%

-8.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.23%

10.35%

-5.12%

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIAX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than GABFX's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEIAX vs. GABFX - Dividend Comparison

SEIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than GABFX's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GABFX
GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund
2.81%2.69%4.19%5.03%0.71%1.81%1.20%4.72%5.13%1.07%0.00%7.43%
SEIAX
SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A
2.72%2.94%5.16%3.77%13.78%10.42%2.34%2.13%3.63%1.57%1.73%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEIAX and GABFX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GABFX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to SEIAX (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIAX dropped -20.97% vs GABFX's -27.84%.

SEIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEIAX and GABFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer