PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEHAX vs. FGLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEHAX vs. FGLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Fund (SEHAX) and Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEHAX achieves a 13.11% return, which is significantly higher than FGLGX's 10.11% return.


SEHAX

1D
0.11%
1M
6.81%
YTD
13.11%
6M
14.44%
1Y
29.33%
3Y*
23.24%
5Y*
13.76%
10Y*

FGLGX

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.30%
YTD
10.11%
6M
12.09%
1Y
32.08%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
16.96%
10Y*
16.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEHAX vs. FGLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SEHAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Fund
13.11%17.99%24.97%21.99%-15.84%32.78%13.16%28.09%-5.81%
FGLGX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund
10.11%28.57%27.45%24.80%-7.23%26.53%10.01%32.37%-7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SEHAX and FGLGX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2018

0.92

The correlation between SEHAX and FGLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEHAX vs. FGLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEHAX
SEHAX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SEHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SEHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FGLGX
FGLGX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FGLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FGLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEHAX vs. FGLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Fund (SEHAX) and Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEHAXFGLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.63

2.70

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.65

3.71

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.49

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

3.50

+0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.14

16.03

+2.11

SEHAX vs. FGLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the FGLGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEHAX and FGLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEHAXFGLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.70

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

1.01

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.88

-0.19

Drawdowns

SEHAX vs. FGLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEHAX drawdown since its inception was -35.77%, roughly equal to the maximum FGLGX drawdown of -36.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEHAX and FGLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEHAXFGLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.77%

-36.42%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-9.43%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.69%

-18.75%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.77%

-21.21%

-14.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.24%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.03%

-3.78%

-5.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

2.06%

-0.39%

Volatility

SEHAX vs. FGLGX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Fund (SEHAX) and Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) have volatilities of 3.03% and 2.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEHAXFGLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

2.89%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

9.34%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.54%

12.27%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.04%

16.89%

+4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

18.37%

+3.37%

SEHAX vs. FGLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEHAX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than FGLGX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEHAX vs. FGLGX - Dividend Comparison

SEHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than FGLGX's 8.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGLGX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund
8.94%9.84%7.99%5.29%6.55%9.22%5.36%7.25%12.29%4.61%1.69%5.94%
SEHAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Fund
4.91%5.52%7.85%1.15%12.75%23.76%1.69%1.97%1.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEHAX and FGLGX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEHAX has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to FGLGX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEHAX dropped -35.77% vs FGLGX's -36.42%.

FGLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEHAX and FGLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer