PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEGA.L vs. IJPH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEGA.L vs. IJPH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEGA.L) and iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEGA.L achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than IJPH.L's 19.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SEGA.L has underperformed IJPH.L with an annualized return of 0.52%, while IJPH.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.77% annualized return.


SEGA.L

1D
0.21%
1M
0.89%
YTD
-2.14%
6M
-2.17%
1Y
1.39%
3Y*
2.02%
5Y*
-2.37%
10Y*
0.52%

IJPH.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
6.95%
YTD
19.91%
6M
21.68%
1Y
52.45%
3Y*
28.46%
5Y*
20.45%
10Y*
14.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEGA.L vs. IJPH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEGA.L
iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
-2.14%5.88%-2.94%4.76%-13.69%-9.85%10.69%1.45%1.62%3.47%
IJPH.L
iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
19.91%29.38%23.82%34.19%-4.30%11.94%9.27%15.95%-15.90%19.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SEGA.L and IJPH.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2012

-0.17

The correlation between SEGA.L and IJPH.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (all time) to 0.05 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEGA.L vs. IJPH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEGA.L
SEGA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SEGA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEGA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEGA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SEGA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEGA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

IJPH.L
IJPH.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEGA.L vs. IJPH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEGA.L) and iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEGA.LIJPH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.49

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

5.41

-5.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.57

19.27

-18.69

SEGA.L vs. IJPH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEGA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEGA.L and IJPH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEGA.LIJPH.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

2.62

-2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

1.07

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

0.77

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.73

-0.58

Drawdowns

SEGA.L vs. IJPH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEGA.L drawdown since its inception was -26.75%, smaller than the maximum IJPH.L drawdown of -34.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEGA.L and IJPH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEGA.LIJPH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.75%

-34.55%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-9.64%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.26%

-21.95%

+15.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.85%

-21.95%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.75%

-34.55%

+7.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.89%

-0.37%

-19.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.41%

-7.42%

-2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.71%

-0.29%

Volatility

SEGA.L vs. IJPH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEGA.L) is 1.77%, while iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that SEGA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJPH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEGA.LIJPH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

3.51%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.34%

15.39%

-11.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.55%

19.98%

-14.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.48%

19.01%

-11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.50%

19.24%

-10.74%

SEGA.L vs. IJPH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEGA.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IJPH.L's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEGA.L vs. IJPH.L - Dividend Comparison

SEGA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while IJPH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJPH.L
iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEGA.L
iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.19%2.25%1.82%0.97%0.26%0.25%0.45%0.68%0.65%0.69%0.86%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEGA.L and IJPH.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SEGA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SEGA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPH.L.

SEGA.L is categorized as European Government Bonds, while IJPH.L is Japan Equities. SEGA.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SEGA.L and 0.64% for IJPH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEGA.L and IJPH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer