PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEF vs. QQQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEF vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly lower than QQQD's 5.92% return.


SEF

1D
-0.51%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
2.28%
6M
4.12%
1Y
-1.58%
3Y*
-12.24%
5Y*
-6.67%
10Y*
-12.50%

QQQD

1D
0.97%
1M
10.75%
YTD
5.92%
6M
8.00%
1Y
-12.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEF vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
2.28%-9.82%-12.34%
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
5.92%-20.32%-27.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SEF and QQQD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEF vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEF
SEF Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
SEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEF Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQD
QQQD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
QQQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEF vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEFQQQDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.91

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

-0.56

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.33

-0.89

+0.56

SEF vs. QQQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEF Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is higher than the QQQD Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEF and QQQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEF vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and QQQD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEFQQQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.51%

-49.47%

-47.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-22.72%

+11.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.33%

-42.73%

-53.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.74%

-30.65%

-52.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

14.48%

-9.72%

Volatility

SEF vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 4.05%, while Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEFQQQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

7.24%

-3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

15.69%

-4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.46%

20.86%

-6.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.97%

26.85%

-8.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

26.85%

-6.37%

SEF vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEF vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison

SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than QQQD's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
2.90%4.33%5.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
3.56%4.33%5.72%4.43%0.39%0.00%0.12%1.25%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEF and QQQD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQD has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to SEF (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs QQQD's -49.47%.

On 1-year performance, SEF leads with -1.58% vs -12.65% for QQQD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEF has performed better with a -1.58% return vs -12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.

SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 2.90% for QQQD.

SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 0.57% for QQQD.

SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEF and QQQD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer