SEF vs. DIVO
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEF is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. SEF is passively managed, while DIVO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SEF returned -6.78%/yr vs 10.94%/yr for DIVO. At a correlation of -0.76, they often move in opposite directions. SEF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
SEF vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 5.40% return.
SEF
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -3.52%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- -2.58%
- 3Y*
- -12.09%
- 5Y*
- -6.78%
- 10Y*
- -12.45%
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 4.24%
- 1Y
- 17.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- —
SEF vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 2.80% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -27.02% | -16.93% | -23.51% | 10.34% | -17.12% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.40% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and DIVO is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2016 | -0.76 |
The correlation between SEF and DIVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.83 to -0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
SEF vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEF
DIVO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SEF
DIVO
Basic Materials
SEF
-
DIVO
Communication Services
SEF
-
DIVO
Consumer Cyclical
SEF
-
DIVO
Consumer Defensive
SEF
-
DIVO
Energy
SEF
-
DIVO
Healthcare
SEF
-
DIVO
Industrials
SEF
-
DIVO
Real Estate
SEF
-
DIVO
-
Technology
SEF
-
DIVO
Utilities
SEF
-
DIVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
DIVO
SEF vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEF | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.33 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 2.93 | -3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 10.48 | -11.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEF vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -30.04% | -66.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -5.95% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.40% | -12.12% | -27.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | -13.72% | -27.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.31% | -1.61% | -94.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.74% | -2.60% | -80.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.81% | 1.66% | +3.15% |
Volatility
SEF vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Financials (SEF) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.94%. This indicates that SEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 2.94% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 7.14% | +4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51% | 9.21% | +5.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 11.95% | +6.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 14.82% | +5.66% |
SEF vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEF vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than DIVO's 6.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.43% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.54% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and DIVO have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEF has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to DIVO (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.94% vs -6.78% for SEF. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.94% return vs -6.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 3.54% for SEF.
SEF is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEF and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer