SEF vs. ABCS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and ABCS (Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEF is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while ABCS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BNY Mellon ABC Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SEF returned -3.98% vs 19.15% for ABCS. At a correlation of -0.79, they often move in opposite directions. SEF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for ABCS.

Performance

SEF vs. ABCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than ABCS's 13.29% return.

SEF

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -4.86%
• 6M: -0.23%
• YTD: -1.02%
• 1Y: -3.98%
• 3Y*: -12.00%
• 5Y*: -7.28%
• 10Y*: -12.23%

ABCS

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 3.50%
• 6M: 10.00%
• YTD: 13.29%
• 1Y: 19.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEF vs. ABCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SEF ProShares Short Financials	-1.02%	-9.82%	-17.81%	-0.06%
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF	13.29%	7.95%	14.47%	-0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SEF and ABCS is -0.77, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2023	-0.79

The correlation between SEF and ABCS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.79 to -0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

SEF vs. ABCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SEF	ABCS
Financial Services	74.6%	20.5%
Basic Materials	-	3.5%
Communication Services	-	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.0%
Energy	-	6.3%
Healthcare	-	15.2%
Industrials	-	11.1%
Real Estate	-	4.4%
Technology	-	15.0%
Utilities	-	3.4%

Return for Risk

SEF vs. ABCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEF

SEF Risk / Return Rank: 6
SEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
SEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
SEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6
SEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
SEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6

ABCS

ABCS Risk / Return Rank: 53
ABCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ABCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ABCS Omega Ratio Rank: 49
ABCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ABCS Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEF vs. ABCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEF	ABCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.27	1.42	-1.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.30	2.11	-2.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.25	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	2.31	-2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	7.28	-8.02

SEF vs. ABCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEF Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the ABCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEF and ABCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEF vs. ABCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than ABCS's maximum drawdown of -20.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and ABCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEF	ABCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.51%	-20.52%	-75.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.12%	-8.33%	-5.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.45%	0.00%	-96.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.78%	-3.40%	-79.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.43%	2.64%	+2.79%

Volatility

SEF vs. ABCS - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short Financials (SEF) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) at 3.30%. This indicates that SEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEF	ABCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	3.30%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.33%	9.32%	+2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.65%	13.62%	+1.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.98%	16.96%	+1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.45%	16.96%	+3.49%

SEF vs. ABCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ABCS's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEF vs. ABCS - Dividend Comparison

SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than ABCS's 1.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF	1.15%	1.37%	1.39%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SEF ProShares Short Financials	3.39%	4.33%	5.72%	4.43%	0.39%	0.00%	0.12%	1.25%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEF and ABCS in my portfolio?

SEF and ABCS have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEF or ABCS?

SEF has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to ABCS (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs ABCS's -20.52%.

Which ETF is better, SEF or ABCS?

On 1-year performance, ABCS leads with 19.15% vs -3.98% for SEF. On fees, ABCS is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, ABCS has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEF or ABCS?

Over the 1-year period, ABCS has performed better with a 19.15% return vs -3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEF or ABCS?

ABCS is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEF or ABCS?

SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.15% for ABCS.

What is the main difference between SEF and ABCS?

SEF is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ABCS is Mid Cap Blend Equities. SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while ABCS tracks BNY Mellon ABC Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 0.27% for ABCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.