PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEEM vs. CLIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEEM vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEEM achieves a 31.00% return, which is significantly higher than CLIP's 1.50% return.


SEEM

1D
-1.11%
1M
9.98%
YTD
31.00%
6M
34.54%
1Y
61.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLIP

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.82%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEEM vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SEEM
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF
31.00%38.16%-6.86%
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.50%4.23%1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SEEM and CLIP is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEEM vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEEM
SEEM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CLIP
CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEEM vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEEMCLIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-14.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-68.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

20.66

-19.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

142.22

-137.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.46

1,151.15

-1,133.69

SEEM vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEEM Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 17.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEEM and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEEMCLIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

17.26

-14.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.91

10.71

-8.80

Drawdowns

SEEM vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEEM drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEEM and CLIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEEMCLIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-0.08%

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.01%

-0.03%

-13.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

0.00%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-0.00%

-2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

0.00%

+3.52%

Volatility

SEEM vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.06%. This indicates that SEEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEEMCLIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

0.06%

+8.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.02%

0.14%

+16.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.69%

0.23%

+19.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.80%

0.44%

+19.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.80%

0.44%

+19.36%

SEEM vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEEM vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

SEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than CLIP's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.91%4.14%5.11%2.75%
SEEM
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.42%3.31%0.31%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEEM and CLIP have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEEM has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to CLIP (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEEM dropped -14.34% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

On 1-year performance, SEEM leads with 61.31% vs 3.96% for CLIP. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEEM has performed better with a 61.31% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEEM.

CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.42% for SEEM.

SEEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: SEI and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEEM and 0.07% for CLIP.

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.26 vs 3.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEEM and CLIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer