SEEGX vs. URTH

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SEEGX (JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund) and URTH (iShares MSCI World ETF) are both funds - SEEGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by JPMorgan, while URTH is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index (Net). Over the past 10 years, SEEGX returned 19.28%/yr vs 13.15%/yr for URTH. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SEEGX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for URTH.

Performance

SEEGX vs. URTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEEGX achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than URTH's 8.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SEEGX has outperformed URTH with an annualized return of 19.28%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively lower 13.15% annualized return.

SEEGX

• 1D: -3.78%
• 1M: -0.87%
• YTD: 3.01%
• 6M: 0.98%
• 1Y: 15.13%
• 3Y*: 21.88%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: 19.28%

URTH

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 8.23%
• 6M: 9.02%
• 1Y: 23.15%
• 3Y*: 19.96%
• 5Y*: 11.47%
• 10Y*: 13.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEEGX vs. URTH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SEEGX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund	3.01%	14.08%	35.14%	34.62%	-25.40%	18.17%	56.02%	39.13%	0.50%	38.03%
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF	8.23%	21.36%	18.66%	23.95%	-17.97%	22.27%	15.78%	28.15%	-8.56%	22.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SEEGX and URTH is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2012	0.78

The correlation between SEEGX and URTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SEEGX vs. URTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEEGX

SEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 13
SEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
SEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
SEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
SEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
SEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

URTH

URTH Risk / Return Rank: 62
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 62
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEEGX vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SEEGX	URTH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.89	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	2.59	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.34	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	2.57	-1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.73	11.56	-8.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEEGX vs. URTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEEGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the URTH Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEEGX and URTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEEGX	URTH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	1.89	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.71	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.76	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.72	-0.15

Drawdowns

SEEGX vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEEGX drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than URTH's maximum drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEEGX and URTH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEEGX	URTH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.09%	-34.01%	-28.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.82%	-9.06%	-7.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.50%	-16.94%	-4.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.23%	-26.05%	-5.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.85%	-34.01%	+2.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.49%	-2.49%	-2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.90%	-4.37%	-12.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.90%	2.01%	+3.89%

Volatility

SEEGX vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) at 3.82%. This indicates that SEEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEEGX	URTH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	3.82%	+1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.87%	9.80%	+2.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.07%	12.34%	+3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.24%	16.22%	+4.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.63%	17.29%	+4.34%

SEEGX vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEEGX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEEGX vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison

SEEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.11%, more than URTH's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SEEGX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund	11.11%	11.44%	2.00%	0.12%	3.42%	14.92%	5.27%	12.85%	15.97%	14.79%	9.88%	4.49%
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF	1.37%	1.48%	1.47%	1.70%	1.68%	1.50%	1.52%	2.16%	2.30%	1.88%	2.15%	2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEEGX and URTH in my portfolio?

SEEGX and URTH have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEEGX or URTH?

SEEGX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to URTH (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEEGX dropped -62.09% vs URTH's -34.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.