SEEGX vs. GCGIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SEEGX (JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund) and GCGIX (Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SEEGX returned 19.86%/yr vs 18.09%/yr for GCGIX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SEEGX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for GCGIX.

Performance

SEEGX vs. GCGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEEGX achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly higher than GCGIX's 6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SEEGX has outperformed GCGIX with an annualized return of 19.86%, while GCGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.09% annualized return.

SEEGX

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 6.70%
• YTD: 7.85%
• 6M: 6.50%
• 1Y: 21.53%
• 3Y*: 23.78%
• 5Y*: 13.72%
• 10Y*: 19.86%

GCGIX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 6.79%
• YTD: 6.18%
• 6M: 5.96%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: 28.63%
• 5Y*: 16.85%
• 10Y*: 18.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEEGX vs. GCGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SEEGX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund	7.85%	14.08%	35.14%	34.62%	-25.40%	18.17%	56.02%	39.13%	0.50%	38.03%
GCGIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund	6.18%	15.51%	53.44%	37.56%	-29.62%	29.10%	32.21%	29.70%	-4.58%	29.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SEEGX and GCGIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 1997	0.96

The correlation between SEEGX and GCGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SEEGX vs. GCGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEEGX

SEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 19
SEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
SEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
SEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
SEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
SEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

GCGIX

GCGIX Risk / Return Rank: 24
GCGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GCGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
GCGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
GCGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
GCGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEEGX vs. GCGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SEEGX	GCGIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.59	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.17	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.28	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	1.44	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.74	4.71	-0.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEEGX vs. GCGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEEGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the GCGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEEGX and GCGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEEGX	GCGIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	1.59	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.76	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92	0.84	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.46	+0.11

Drawdowns

SEEGX vs. GCGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEEGX drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, smaller than the maximum GCGIX drawdown of -65.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEEGX and GCGIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEEGX	GCGIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.09%	-65.78%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.82%	-17.25%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.50%	-25.10%	+3.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.23%	-32.57%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.85%	-32.94%	+1.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.31%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.90%	-20.82%	+3.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.89%	5.25%	+0.64%

Volatility

SEEGX vs. GCGIX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) at 3.25%. This indicates that SEEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEEGX	GCGIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	3.25%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.22%	11.81%	-0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.60%	15.66%	-0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.19%	22.23%	-2.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.60%	21.55%	+0.05%

SEEGX vs. GCGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEEGX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than GCGIX's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEEGX vs. GCGIX - Dividend Comparison

SEEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, more than GCGIX's 7.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCGIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund	7.06%	7.50%	23.16%	7.08%	19.27%	42.43%	9.71%	4.02%	10.10%	4.76%	0.76%	0.87%
SEEGX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund	10.61%	11.44%	2.00%	0.12%	3.42%	14.92%	5.27%	12.85%	15.97%	14.79%	9.88%	4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEEGX and GCGIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, SEEGX and GCGIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SEEGX or GCGIX?

SEEGX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to GCGIX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEEGX dropped -62.09% vs GCGIX's -65.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.