SEDY.L vs. SGLN.L
SEDY.L (iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - SEDY.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEDY.L returned 8.20%/yr vs 14.27%/yr for SGLN.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEDY.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLN.L.
Performance
SEDY.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEDY.L achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's 3.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SEDY.L has underperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of 8.20%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.27% annualized return.
SEDY.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 29.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.20%
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.17%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
SEDY.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEDY.L iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 10.72% | 18.69% | 8.71% | 13.01% | -22.64% | 12.64% | -5.85% | 10.44% | 0.26% | 14.72% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 3.89% | 53.66% | 28.20% | 7.24% | 11.84% | -2.57% | 19.62% | 14.63% | 4.36% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEDY.L and SGLN.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2011 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEDY.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
SEDY.L
SGLN.L
SEDY.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEDY.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.29 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.95 | 1.91 | +4.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.57 | 5.05 | +10.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEDY.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 1.45 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 1.23 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.90 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.55 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
SEDY.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEDY.L drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, roughly equal to the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEDY.L and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEDY.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -41.71% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | -17.57% | +12.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.92% | -17.57% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.66% | -17.57% | -12.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.39% | -21.91% | -8.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -16.01% | +12.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -14.76% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 6.67% | -4.81% |
Volatility
SEDY.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) is 4.19%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that SEDY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEDY.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 5.08% | -0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 20.08% | -11.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.43% | 23.19% | -11.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 16.30% | -1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 15.78% | +0.44% |
SEDY.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEDY.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEDY.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
SEDY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, while SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEDY.L iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 5.28% | 5.72% | 7.74% | 7.98% | 9.33% | 6.41% | 5.11% | 5.84% | 5.54% | 4.08% | 4.25% | 6.31% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEDY.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SEDY.L.
SEDY.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SGLN.L is Gold. SEDY.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SEDY.L and 0.12% for SGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for SEDY.L and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer