SEDY.L vs. IITU.L
SEDY.L (iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SEDY.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEDY.L returned 8.20%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEDY.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
SEDY.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEDY.L achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SEDY.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 8.20%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.
SEDY.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 29.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.20%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
SEDY.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEDY.L iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 10.72% | 18.69% | 8.71% | 13.01% | -22.64% | 12.64% | -5.85% | 10.44% | 0.26% | 14.72% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEDY.L and IITU.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.48 |
The correlation between SEDY.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SEDY.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEDY.L
IITU.L
Financial Services
-
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
SEDY.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
SEDY.L
IITU.L
Industrials
SEDY.L
IITU.L
Basic Materials
SEDY.L
IITU.L
-
Technology
SEDY.L
IITU.L
Utilities
SEDY.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SEDY.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
SEDY.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SEDY.L
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
SEDY.L
IITU.L
-
Healthcare
SEDY.L
-
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEDY.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SEDY.L
IITU.L
SEDY.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEDY.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.95 | 3.17 | +2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.57 | 8.17 | +7.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEDY.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 2.71 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 1.16 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 1.28 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 1.23 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
SEDY.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEDY.L drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEDY.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEDY.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -28.03% | -15.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | -16.76% | +11.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.92% | -28.03% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.66% | -28.03% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.39% | -28.03% | -2.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -2.89% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -5.14% | -7.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 6.51% | -4.65% |
Volatility
SEDY.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) is 4.19%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that SEDY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEDY.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 7.01% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 14.45% | -5.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.43% | 19.60% | -8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 21.94% | -7.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 21.31% | -5.09% |
SEDY.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEDY.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEDY.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
SEDY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, while IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEDY.L iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 5.28% | 5.72% | 7.74% | 7.98% | 9.33% | 6.41% | 5.11% | 5.84% | 5.54% | 4.08% | 4.25% | 6.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEDY.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SEDY.L.
SEDY.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. SEDY.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SEDY.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for SEDY.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer