PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEDAX vs. SHMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEDAX vs. SHMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt (SHMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SEDAX having a 4.04% return and SHMDX slightly higher at 4.06%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SEDAX having a 4.42% annualized return and SHMDX not far behind at 4.39%.


SEDAX

1D
0.32%
1M
1.39%
YTD
4.04%
6M
4.76%
1Y
16.93%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
4.42%

SHMDX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.37%
YTD
4.06%
6M
4.62%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
13.57%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
4.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEDAX vs. SHMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
4.04%20.33%3.13%12.86%-14.53%-4.93%4.68%15.55%-8.11%15.32%
SHMDX
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt
4.06%15.13%8.90%14.81%-19.74%-2.52%7.06%15.20%-7.86%11.58%

Correlation

The correlation between SEDAX and SHMDX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.79

The correlation between SEDAX and SHMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEDAX vs. SHMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEDAX
SEDAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SEDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SEDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SHMDX
SHMDX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SHMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SHMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEDAX vs. SHMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt (SHMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEDAXSHMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.81

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

3.83

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.71

16.98

-4.27

SEDAX vs. SHMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEDAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is comparable to the SHMDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEDAX and SHMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEDAXSHMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04

3.59

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.50

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.58

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.53

-0.11

Drawdowns

SEDAX vs. SHMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEDAX drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, roughly equal to the maximum SHMDX drawdown of -35.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEDAX and SHMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEDAXSHMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.03%

-35.83%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.49%

-4.33%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.44%

-6.23%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.01%

-31.98%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.25%

-31.98%

+4.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-5.94%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

0.97%

+0.39%

Volatility

SEDAX vs. SHMDX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt (SHMDX) at 1.55%. This indicates that SEDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEDAXSHMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

1.55%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.98%

3.86%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.68%

4.63%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.02%

6.94%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.43%

7.60%

+0.83%

SEDAX vs. SHMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEDAX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than SHMDX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEDAX vs. SHMDX - Dividend Comparison

SEDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, more than SHMDX's 6.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
8.67%7.30%7.24%4.65%2.08%4.69%1.52%3.75%3.17%4.70%3.59%1.00%
SHMDX
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt
6.15%6.21%6.73%8.10%10.70%4.78%5.24%5.51%6.80%6.12%6.72%6.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEDAX and SHMDX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEDAX has higher volatility (1.94%) compared to SHMDX (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEDAX dropped -37.03% vs SHMDX's -35.83%.

SHMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 3.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEDAX and SHMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer