SECUX vs. SMCWX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX).
SECUX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Sep 17, 1969. SMCWX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Apr 30, 1990.
Performance
SECUX vs. SMCWX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SECUX vs. SMCWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | 1.72% | 1.86% | 14.29% | 26.43% | -28.33% | 13.39% | 31.95% | 32.44% | -7.76% | 24.15% |
SMCWX American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A | -1.05% | 14.07% | 2.33% | 18.86% | -29.90% | 10.14% | 37.46% | 30.79% | -9.75% | 26.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SECUX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly higher than SMCWX's -1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SECUX has outperformed SMCWX with an annualized return of 10.10%, while SMCWX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.04% annualized return.
SECUX
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 10.47%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
SMCWX
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- -7.83%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 20.45%
- 3Y*
- 8.86%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SECUX vs. SMCWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SECUX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SMCWX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SECUX vs. SMCWX — Risk / Return Rank
SECUX
SMCWX
SECUX vs. SMCWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SECUX | SMCWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 1.17 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 1.72 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.23 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 1.66 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | 6.37 | -2.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SECUX | SMCWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 1.17 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.01 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.51 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.57 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between SECUX and SMCWX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SECUX vs. SMCWX - Dividend Comparison
SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMCWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 41.48% | 6.54% | 14.34% | 2.18% | 27.68% | 12.89% | 0.59% | 14.34% |
SMCWX American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A | 4.90% | 4.84% | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 9.24% | 1.60% | 4.24% | 7.06% | 4.48% | 0.35% | 6.49% |
Drawdowns
SECUX vs. SMCWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SECUX drawdown since its inception was -71.68%, which is greater than SMCWX's maximum drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECUX and SMCWX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SECUX | SMCWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.68% | -62.46% | -9.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -11.83% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.80% | -39.79% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.56% | -39.79% | +1.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -10.12% | +3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -14.98% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 3.08% | +0.21% |
Volatility
SECUX vs. SMCWX - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) have volatilities of 7.67% and 7.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SECUX | SMCWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.67% | 7.62% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 11.82% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.02% | 17.93% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 18.05% | +3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 17.76% | +3.36% |