SECUX vs. LSHAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX).
SECUX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Sep 17, 1969. LSHAX is managed by Kinetics. It was launched on May 4, 2007.
Performance
SECUX vs. LSHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SECUX vs. LSHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | -1.69% | 1.86% | 14.29% | 26.43% | -28.33% | 13.39% | 31.95% | 32.44% | -7.76% | 24.15% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 50.22% | -19.53% | 82.16% | -19.74% | 39.45% | 42.75% | 5.23% | 31.30% | -8.18% | 15.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SECUX achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly lower than LSHAX's 50.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SECUX has underperformed LSHAX with an annualized return of 9.72%, while LSHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.52% annualized return.
SECUX
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -8.16%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 6M
- -3.52%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
LSHAX
- 1D
- -7.12%
- 1M
- -9.27%
- YTD
- 50.22%
- 6M
- 41.09%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.23%
- 5Y*
- 17.40%
- 10Y*
- 19.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SECUX vs. LSHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SECUX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is lower than LSHAX's 1.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SECUX vs. LSHAX — Risk / Return Rank
SECUX
LSHAX
SECUX vs. LSHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SECUX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 0.17 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.72 | 0.53 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.07 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 0.12 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 0.19 | +1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SECUX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 0.17 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.52 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.65 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.35 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between SECUX and LSHAX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SECUX vs. LSHAX - Dividend Comparison
SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LSHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 41.48% | 6.54% | 14.34% | 2.18% | 27.68% | 12.89% | 0.59% | 14.34% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 7.71% | 11.59% | 4.66% | 9.40% | 1.76% | 0.11% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 4.85% | 3.94% | 1.84% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SECUX vs. LSHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SECUX drawdown since its inception was -71.68%, roughly equal to the maximum LSHAX drawdown of -69.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECUX and LSHAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SECUX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.68% | -69.03% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -37.04% | +24.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.80% | -45.79% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.56% | -50.78% | +12.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.07% | -15.53% | +5.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -21.94% | +3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 24.25% | -20.99% |
Volatility
SECUX vs. LSHAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) is 6.80%, while Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that SECUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SECUX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.80% | 9.76% | -2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.93% | 27.25% | -15.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.78% | 40.86% | -20.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 33.69% | -12.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 30.16% | -9.06% |