PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SECUX vs. GOF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SECUX vs. GOF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECUX achieves a 16.03% return, which is significantly higher than GOF's -9.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SECUX has outperformed GOF with an annualized return of 11.69%, while GOF has yielded a comparatively lower 7.66% annualized return.


SECUX

1D
0.90%
1M
2.69%
YTD
16.03%
6M
13.66%
1Y
19.34%
3Y*
15.18%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
11.69%

GOF

1D
-1.30%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-9.63%
6M
-5.68%
1Y
-13.71%
3Y*
2.87%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*
7.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECUX vs. GOF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SECUX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund
16.03%1.86%14.29%26.43%-28.33%13.39%31.95%32.44%-7.76%24.15%
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
-9.63%-1.92%38.04%-3.04%-5.78%4.90%21.51%10.51%-5.95%22.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SECUX and GOF is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SECUX vs. GOF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECUX
SECUX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SECUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SECUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECUX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

GOF
GOF Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
GOF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOF Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
GOF Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOF Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECUX vs. GOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SECUXGOFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.86

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

-0.59

+2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

-1.07

+8.28

SECUX vs. GOF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the GOF Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECUX and GOF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SECUX vs. GOF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECUX drawdown since its inception was -71.68%, which is greater than GOF's maximum drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECUX and GOF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SECUXGOFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.68%

-54.66%

-17.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-23.24%

+14.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.43%

-28.56%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.80%

-32.41%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.56%

-38.50%

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-19.50%

+19.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-7.08%

-11.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

12.84%

-10.10%

Volatility

SECUX vs. GOF - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) at 3.40%. This indicates that SECUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SECUXGOFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

3.40%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.39%

11.11%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.53%

18.04%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.53%

18.19%

+3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.24%

19.54%

+1.70%

SECUX vs. GOF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECUX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is lower than GOF's 1.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

SECUX vs. GOF - Dividend Comparison

SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.62%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
20.62%16.97%14.32%17.07%14.36%11.93%11.26%12.08%11.96%10.13%11.13%12.98%
SECUX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.31%41.48%6.54%14.34%2.18%27.68%12.89%0.59%14.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


SECUX and GOF have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SECUX has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to GOF (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECUX dropped -71.68% vs GOF's -54.66%.

SECUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SECUX and GOF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer