SECUX vs. FMDGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SECUX (Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund) and FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SECUX returned 3.41%/yr vs 4.43%/yr for FMDGX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. SECUX charges 1.42%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMDGX.

Performance

SECUX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECUX achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than FMDGX's 0.60% return.

SECUX

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -3.48%
• 6M: 6.53%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 1Y: 10.35%
• 3Y*: 10.72%
• 5Y*: 3.41%
• 10Y*: 10.32%
• ALL TIME*: 5.70%

FMDGX

• 1D: 2.29%
• 1M: -3.87%
• 6M: 1.50%
• YTD: 0.60%
• 1Y: -0.77%
• 3Y*: 11.99%
• 5Y*: 4.43%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SECUX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund	10.67%	1.86%	14.29%	26.43%	-28.33%	13.39%	31.95%	4.35%
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund	0.60%	8.60%	22.03%	25.79%	-26.67%	12.67%	34.84%	4.63%

Correlation

The correlation between SECUX and FMDGX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019	0.96

The correlation between SECUX and FMDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SECUX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SECUX

SECUX Risk / Return Rank: 15
SECUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
SECUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
SECUX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
SECUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
SECUX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

FMDGX

FMDGX Risk / Return Rank: 3
FMDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FMDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FMDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FMDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FMDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SECUX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SECUX	FMDGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	-0.17	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	-0.12	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.99	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	-0.21	+1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.73	-0.57	+3.30

SECUX vs. FMDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECUX Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the FMDGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECUX and FMDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SECUX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECUX drawdown since its inception was -71.68%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECUX and FMDGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SECUX	FMDGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.68%	-38.59%	-33.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	-14.75%	+5.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.43%	-25.30%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.80%	-38.59%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.74%	-6.20%	+0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.34%	-11.03%	-7.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	5.29%	-2.32%

Volatility

SECUX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) at 5.15%. This indicates that SECUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SECUX	FMDGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.76%	5.15%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.17%	14.00%	+0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.24%	17.61%	-0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.63%	22.54%	-0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.23%	24.23%	-3.00%

SECUX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECUX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

SECUX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison

SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund	1.84%	1.85%	0.47%	0.63%	0.81%	6.43%	0.36%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.31%	41.48%	6.54%	14.34%	2.18%	27.68%	12.89%	0.59%	14.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SECUX and FMDGX in my portfolio?

SECUX and FMDGX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SECUX or FMDGX?

SECUX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to FMDGX (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECUX dropped -71.68% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SECUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.