PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SECU vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SECU vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Securitized Income Active ETF (SECU) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SECU

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.47%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACWI

1D
0.30%
1M
4.45%
YTD
12.47%
6M
13.07%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECU vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SECU and ACWI is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026

0.36

SECU vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SECU
ACWI

Financial Services

0.0%
16.1%

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Communication Services

-

9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.0%

Energy

-

4.2%

Healthcare

-

8.1%

Industrials

-

10.9%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

29.4%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Financial Services

SECU
0.0%
ACWI
16.1%

Basic Materials

SECU

-

ACWI
3.7%

Communication Services

SECU

-

ACWI
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SECU

-

ACWI
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

SECU

-

ACWI
5.0%

Energy

SECU

-

ACWI
4.2%

Healthcare

SECU

-

ACWI
8.1%

Industrials

SECU

-

ACWI
10.9%

Real Estate

SECU

-

ACWI
1.8%

Technology

SECU

-

ACWI
29.4%

Utilities

SECU

-

ACWI
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SECU vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECU

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECU vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Securitized Income Active ETF (SECU) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SECU vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SECUACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.43

+0.72

Drawdowns

SECU vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECU drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECU and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SECUACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-56.00%

+54.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.53%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-8.61%

+8.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

Volatility

SECU vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SECUACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34%

12.79%

-9.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.34%

16.05%

-12.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.34%

17.11%

-13.77%

SECU vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

SECU vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

SECU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
SECU
iShares Securitized Income Active ETF
2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SECU and ACWI have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SECU.

SECU has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

SECU is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while ACWI is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SECU and 0.32% for ACWI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SECU and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer