SECU vs. ACWI
SECU (iShares Securitized Income Active ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SECU is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by iShares, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. SECU is actively managed, while ACWI is passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SECU charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
SECU vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SECU
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 23.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
SECU vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SECU iShares Securitized Income Active ETF | 1.73% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 6.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SECU and ACWI is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SECU vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
SECU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ACWI
SECU vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Securitized Income Active ETF (SECU) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SECU | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SECU vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SECU drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECU and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SECU | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -56.00% | +54.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -2.96% | +2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -8.59% | +8.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.24% | — |
Volatility
SECU vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SECU | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30% | 13.62% | -10.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 16.19% | -12.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 17.07% | -13.77% |
SECU vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SECU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
SECU vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
SECU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than ACWI's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.46% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
SECU iShares Securitized Income Active ETF | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SECU and ACWI have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SECU.
SECU has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.46% for ACWI.
SECU is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while ACWI is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SECU and 0.32% for ACWI.
Find the right allocation for SECU and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer