SECT vs. DYNF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SECT (Main Sector Rotation ETF) and DYNF (BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SECT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Main Management, while DYNF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SECT returned 12.80%/yr vs 15.04%/yr for DYNF. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SECT charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DYNF.

Performance

SECT vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SECT having a 11.86% return and DYNF slightly lower at 11.55%.

SECT

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 7.71%
• YTD: 11.86%
• 6M: 12.38%
• 1Y: 31.19%
• 3Y*: 20.34%
• 5Y*: 12.80%
• 10Y*: —

DYNF

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 5.74%
• YTD: 11.55%
• 6M: 11.74%
• 1Y: 30.19%
• 3Y*: 26.22%
• 5Y*: 15.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECT vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF	11.86%	17.80%	18.61%	21.10%	-12.80%	28.88%	15.65%	11.30%
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF	11.55%	20.00%	30.29%	36.25%	-20.27%	22.12%	13.47%	14.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SECT and DYNF is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019	0.92

The correlation between SECT and DYNF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SECT vs. DYNF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SECT	DYNF
Technology	38.9%	39.8%
Financial Services	14.4%	16.2%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	7.8%
Communication Services	12.0%	11.7%
Industrials	10.7%	8.4%
Energy	4.3%	1.9%
Basic Materials	4.0%	0.7%
Healthcare	2.6%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	2.4%
Utilities	0.1%	2.7%
Real Estate	0.0%	1.9%

Return for Risk

SECT vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECT

SECT Risk / Return Rank: 68
SECT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SECT Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
SECT Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SECT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
SECT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

DYNF

DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 73
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 71
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECT vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SECT	DYNF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.44	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	3.32	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.43	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	3.50	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.13	16.97	-4.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SECT vs. DYNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECT Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the DYNF Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECT and DYNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SECT	DYNF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	2.44	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.86	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.83	-0.14

Drawdowns

SECT vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECT drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, which is greater than DYNF's maximum drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECT and DYNF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SECT	DYNF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.09%	-34.72%	-3.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.71%	-8.67%	-2.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.71%	-18.70%	-3.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.71%	-28.65%	+6.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-0.57%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.65%	-5.98%	+1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	1.78%	+0.80%

Volatility

SECT vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison

Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) at 3.27%. This indicates that SECT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SECT	DYNF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	3.27%	+0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	9.55%	+0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.01%	12.44%	+0.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.80%	17.50%	+0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.13%	19.90%	+0.23%

SECT vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECT has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNF's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SECT vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison

SECT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than DYNF's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF	0.89%	1.01%	0.65%	1.11%	1.66%	2.89%	1.52%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF	0.60%	0.32%	0.45%	0.84%	0.86%	0.60%	1.37%	0.77%	1.67%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SECT and DYNF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, SECT and DYNF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SECT or DYNF?

SECT has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to DYNF (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECT dropped -38.09% vs DYNF's -34.72%.

Which ETF is better, SECT or DYNF?

On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 15.04% vs 12.80% for SECT. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SECT or DYNF?

Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 15.04% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SECT or DYNF?

DYNF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for SECT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SECT or DYNF?

DYNF has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.60% for SECT.

What is the main difference between SECT and DYNF?

SECT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DYNF is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Main Management and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for SECT and 0.30% for DYNF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.