PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SECPX vs. SMSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SECPX vs. SMSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Daily Income Ultra Short Duration Bond Fund (SECPX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECPX achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than SMSAX's 7.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SECPX has underperformed SMSAX with an annualized return of 2.32%, while SMSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.77% annualized return.


SECPX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.55%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
2.32%

SMSAX

1D
-0.28%
1M
2.60%
YTD
7.03%
6M
7.79%
1Y
15.70%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*
4.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECPX vs. SMSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SECPX
SEI Daily Income Ultra Short Duration Bond Fund
1.10%4.76%4.68%5.07%-1.22%-0.06%1.84%3.23%1.72%1.67%
SMSAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund
7.03%10.62%6.42%7.21%-4.95%1.47%12.06%4.85%-3.68%5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SECPX and SMSAX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2010

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SECPX vs. SMSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECPX
SECPX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SECPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SECPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

SMSAX
SMSAX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SMSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SMSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECPX vs. SMSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Daily Income Ultra Short Duration Bond Fund (SECPX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SECPXSMSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.43

1.58

+0.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.60

4.37

+3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.66

18.89

+15.77

SECPX vs. SMSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is comparable to the SMSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECPX and SMSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SECPXSMSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

2.97

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.09

1.05

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.86

1.04

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.78

+0.32

Drawdowns

SECPX vs. SMSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECPX drawdown since its inception was -11.64%, which is greater than SMSAX's maximum drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECPX and SMSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SECPXSMSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-10.98%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.53%

-3.66%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.53%

-5.93%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.64%

-9.72%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.47%

-10.98%

+6.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.28%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-2.11%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

0.85%

-0.73%

Volatility

SECPX vs. SMSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Daily Income Ultra Short Duration Bond Fund (SECPX) is 0.41%, while SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX) has a volatility of 1.95%. This indicates that SECPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SECPXSMSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

1.95%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.00%

4.30%

-3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42%

5.41%

-3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.35%

4.67%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.25%

4.61%

-3.36%

SECPX vs. SMSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECPX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than SMSAX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SECPX vs. SMSAX - Dividend Comparison

SECPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than SMSAX's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SECPX
SEI Daily Income Ultra Short Duration Bond Fund
4.07%4.21%3.80%3.17%1.05%0.58%1.49%2.53%2.14%1.44%1.00%1.59%
SMSAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund
4.75%5.08%5.54%4.35%2.13%7.61%2.79%1.01%4.94%2.20%0.07%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


SECPX and SMSAX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMSAX has higher volatility (1.95%) compared to SECPX (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECPX dropped -11.64% vs SMSAX's -10.98%.

SMSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SECPX and SMSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer