PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SECIX vs. TMMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SECIX vs. TMMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECIX achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly lower than TMMAX's 8.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SECIX having a 9.48% annualized return and TMMAX not far ahead at 9.93%.


SECIX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.74%
6M
5.98%
YTD
7.84%
1Y
19.17%
3Y*
8.72%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*
9.48%
ALL TIME*
4.54%

TMMAX

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.01%
6M
5.67%
YTD
8.33%
1Y
13.78%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
9.93%
ALL TIME*
9.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SECIX vs. TMMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SECIX
Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund
7.84%13.92%3.94%9.03%-1.58%27.12%2.60%21.44%-10.05%15.33%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
8.33%11.03%17.07%7.32%-3.11%24.10%1.32%24.00%-2.84%15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SECIX and TMMAX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2007

0.85

The correlation between SECIX and TMMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SECIX vs. TMMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SECIX
SECIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SECIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SECIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

TMMAX
TMMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TMMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
TMMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SECIX vs. TMMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SECIXTMMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.26

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.22

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.76

7.56

+2.20

SECIX vs. TMMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the TMMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECIX and TMMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SECIX vs. TMMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECIX drawdown since its inception was -62.58%, which is greater than TMMAX's maximum drawdown of -41.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECIX and TMMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SECIXTMMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.58%

-41.50%

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-5.78%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-23.00%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

-23.00%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.54%

-33.41%

-5.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-3.38%

+2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.41%

-5.57%

-10.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.69%

+0.06%

Volatility

SECIX vs. TMMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) is 2.41%, while SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that SECIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SECIXTMMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

3.98%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

7.18%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.17%

8.95%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

19.13%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.55%

17.83%

+0.72%

SECIX vs. TMMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TMMAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SECIX vs. TMMAX - Dividend Comparison

SECIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.50%, less than TMMAX's 23.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SECIX
Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund
13.50%14.56%3.80%12.08%9.42%6.96%7.12%7.69%6.34%8.25%3.23%8.36%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
23.27%25.19%23.39%15.23%6.54%4.73%2.15%3.67%4.91%4.10%4.17%5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SECIX and TMMAX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMMAX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to SECIX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECIX dropped -62.58% vs TMMAX's -41.50%.

SECIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SECIX and TMMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer