PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SECIX vs. SWLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SECIX vs. SWLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund (SWLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECIX achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than SWLVX's 14.27% return.


SECIX

1D
0.81%
1M
4.13%
YTD
7.93%
6M
8.05%
1Y
21.73%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
9.70%

SWLVX

1D
0.81%
1M
4.26%
YTD
14.27%
6M
14.87%
1Y
28.30%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECIX vs. SWLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SECIX
Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund
7.93%13.92%3.94%9.03%-1.58%27.12%2.60%21.44%-10.05%0.53%
SWLVX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund
14.27%15.87%14.36%11.45%-7.61%25.15%2.64%26.49%-8.39%0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SECIX and SWLVX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017

0.96

The correlation between SECIX and SWLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SECIX vs. SWLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECIX
SECIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SECIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SECIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLVX
SWLVX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SWLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECIX vs. SWLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund (SWLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SECIXSWLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.49

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

4.28

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.14

17.99

-4.85

SECIX vs. SWLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the SWLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECIX and SWLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SECIXSWLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.70

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.71

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.57

-0.31

Drawdowns

SECIX vs. SWLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECIX drawdown since its inception was -62.58%, which is greater than SWLVX's maximum drawdown of -38.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECIX and SWLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SECIXSWLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.58%

-38.34%

-24.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-6.82%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-15.61%

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

-19.05%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.48%

-4.84%

-11.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.62%

+0.10%

Volatility

SECIX vs. SWLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) is 2.53%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund (SWLVX) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that SECIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SECIXSWLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

3.09%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.30%

8.19%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.98%

10.79%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

14.86%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

18.56%

+0.06%

SECIX vs. SWLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLVX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SECIX vs. SWLVX - Dividend Comparison

SECIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.49%, more than SWLVX's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SECIX
Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund
13.49%14.56%3.80%12.08%9.42%6.96%7.12%7.69%6.34%8.25%3.23%8.36%
SWLVX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund
1.77%2.02%2.75%2.56%2.29%4.86%2.00%4.35%1.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SECIX and SWLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWLVX has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to SECIX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECIX dropped -62.58% vs SWLVX's -38.34%.

SWLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SECIX and SWLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer