PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SECIX vs. SLVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SECIX vs. SLVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) and Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2 (SLVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECIX achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than SLVIX's 13.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SECIX has underperformed SLVIX with an annualized return of 9.70%, while SLVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.


SECIX

1D
0.81%
1M
4.13%
YTD
7.93%
6M
8.05%
1Y
21.73%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
9.70%

SLVIX

1D
0.74%
1M
5.27%
YTD
13.57%
6M
17.08%
1Y
37.33%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECIX vs. SLVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SECIX
Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund
7.93%13.92%3.94%9.03%-1.58%27.12%2.60%21.44%-10.05%15.33%
SLVIX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2
13.57%28.02%12.90%5.90%-0.78%26.68%6.49%26.89%-12.03%19.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SECIX and SLVIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.94

The correlation between SECIX and SLVIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SECIX vs. SLVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECIX
SECIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SECIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SECIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVIX
SLVIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SLVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECIX vs. SLVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) and Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2 (SLVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SECIXSLVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.57

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

4.26

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.14

17.52

-4.39

SECIX vs. SLVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is lower than the SLVIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECIX and SLVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SECIXSLVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

3.26

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.75

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.72

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.45

-0.20

Drawdowns

SECIX vs. SLVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECIX drawdown since its inception was -62.58%, roughly equal to the maximum SLVIX drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECIX and SLVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SECIXSLVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.58%

-59.63%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-9.00%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-14.71%

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

-18.35%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.54%

-41.46%

+2.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.48%

-8.29%

-8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

2.18%

-0.46%

Volatility

SECIX vs. SLVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) is 2.53%, while Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2 (SLVIX) has a volatility of 3.25%. This indicates that SECIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SECIXSLVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

3.25%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.30%

8.83%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.98%

11.76%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

15.90%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

18.68%

-0.06%

SECIX vs. SLVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVIX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

SECIX vs. SLVIX - Dividend Comparison

SECIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.49%, more than SLVIX's 7.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SECIX
Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund
13.49%14.56%3.80%12.08%9.42%6.96%7.12%7.69%6.34%8.25%3.23%8.36%
SLVIX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2
7.37%8.37%3.62%3.75%1.62%5.95%7.47%6.97%5.02%3.73%6.95%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


SECIX and SLVIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLVIX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to SECIX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECIX dropped -62.58% vs SLVIX's -59.63%.

SLVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SECIX and SLVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer