PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SECIX vs. LEXCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SECIX vs. LEXCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECIX achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than LEXCX's 18.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SECIX has underperformed LEXCX with an annualized return of 9.70%, while LEXCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.


SECIX

1D
0.81%
1M
4.13%
YTD
7.93%
6M
8.05%
1Y
21.73%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
9.70%

LEXCX

1D
0.54%
1M
0.73%
YTD
18.37%
6M
16.20%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECIX vs. LEXCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SECIX
Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund
7.93%13.92%3.94%9.03%-1.58%27.12%2.60%21.44%-10.05%15.33%
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
18.37%7.04%3.60%14.53%3.95%26.77%4.36%21.43%-5.44%16.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SECIX and LEXCX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between SECIX and LEXCX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SECIX vs. LEXCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECIX
SECIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SECIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SECIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

LEXCX
LEXCX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LEXCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEXCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEXCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LEXCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEXCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECIX vs. LEXCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SECIXLEXCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.34

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

4.20

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.14

10.61

+2.53

SECIX vs. LEXCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the LEXCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECIX and LEXCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SECIXLEXCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

1.89

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.69

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.64

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.54

-0.28

Drawdowns

SECIX vs. LEXCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECIX drawdown since its inception was -62.58%, which is greater than LEXCX's maximum drawdown of -50.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECIX and LEXCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SECIXLEXCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.58%

-50.42%

-12.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-6.22%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-14.03%

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

-19.75%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.54%

-39.21%

+0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.84%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.48%

-7.12%

-9.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

2.41%

-0.69%

Volatility

SECIX vs. LEXCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) is 2.53%, while Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that SECIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEXCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SECIXLEXCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

4.50%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.30%

10.45%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.98%

13.81%

-3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

16.50%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

18.99%

-0.37%

SECIX vs. LEXCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LEXCX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

SECIX vs. LEXCX - Dividend Comparison

SECIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.49%, more than LEXCX's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
1.39%1.65%1.66%1.58%1.65%1.54%1.91%1.86%2.03%1.79%3.93%2.37%
SECIX
Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund
13.49%14.56%3.80%12.08%9.42%6.96%7.12%7.69%6.34%8.25%3.23%8.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SECIX and LEXCX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEXCX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to SECIX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECIX dropped -62.58% vs LEXCX's -50.42%.

SECIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SECIX and LEXCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer