SECIX vs. FLCSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SECIX (Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund) and FLCSX (Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SECIX returned 9.70%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for FLCSX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SECIX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for FLCSX.

Performance

SECIX vs. FLCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECIX achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than FLCSX's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SECIX has underperformed FLCSX with an annualized return of 9.70%, while FLCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.

SECIX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 7.93%
• 6M: 8.05%
• 1Y: 21.73%
• 3Y*: 11.67%
• 5Y*: 7.43%
• 10Y*: 9.70%

FLCSX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 3.26%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 11.60%
• 1Y: 30.76%
• 3Y*: 25.44%
• 5Y*: 15.93%
• 10Y*: 15.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECIX vs. FLCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SECIX Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund	7.93%	13.92%	3.94%	9.03%	-1.58%	27.12%	2.60%	21.44%	-10.05%	15.33%
FLCSX Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund	9.75%	27.49%	26.31%	23.51%	-8.02%	25.80%	9.05%	31.59%	-13.62%	17.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SECIX and FLCSX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 1995	0.89

The correlation between SECIX and FLCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SECIX vs. FLCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECIX

SECIX Risk / Return Rank: 63
SECIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SECIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SECIX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SECIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SECIX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FLCSX

FLCSX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FLCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FLCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FLCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FLCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FLCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECIX vs. FLCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SECIX	FLCSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	2.60	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.59	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.47	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	3.32	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.14	15.16	-2.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SECIX vs. FLCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FLCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECIX and FLCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SECIX	FLCSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	2.60	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.95	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.82	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.50	-0.25

Drawdowns

SECIX vs. FLCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECIX drawdown since its inception was -62.58%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCSX drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECIX and FLCSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SECIX	FLCSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.58%	-63.67%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-9.55%	+3.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.37%	-18.82%	-4.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.37%	-21.69%	-1.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.54%	-37.11%	-1.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.25%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.48%	-13.82%	-2.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	2.08%	-0.36%

Volatility

SECIX vs. FLCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) is 2.53%, while Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that SECIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SECIX	FLCSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.53%	2.86%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.30%	9.31%	-2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.98%	12.19%	-2.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.61%	16.85%	-0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.62%	18.66%	-0.04%

SECIX vs. FLCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCSX's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

SECIX vs. FLCSX - Dividend Comparison

SECIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.49%, more than FLCSX's 5.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLCSX Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund	5.92%	6.50%	4.26%	2.83%	3.07%	4.71%	3.93%	5.43%	7.63%	3.25%	3.61%	4.55%
SECIX Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund	13.49%	14.56%	3.80%	12.08%	9.42%	6.96%	7.12%	7.69%	6.34%	8.25%	3.23%	8.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SECIX and FLCSX in my portfolio?

SECIX and FLCSX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SECIX or FLCSX?

FLCSX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to SECIX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECIX dropped -62.58% vs FLCSX's -63.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.