SEC0.DE vs. QDVF.DE
SEC0.DE (iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SEC0.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped, while QDVF.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEC0.DE returned 56.37%/yr vs 13.74%/yr for QDVF.DE. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEC0.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVF.DE.
Performance
SEC0.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEC0.DE achieves a 98.10% return, which is significantly higher than QDVF.DE's 32.71% return.
SEC0.DE
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- 18.95%
- YTD
- 98.10%
- 6M
- 98.14%
- 1Y
- 188.23%
- 3Y*
- 56.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 28.30%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
SEC0.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEC0.DE iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 98.10% | 36.46% | 20.85% | 61.01% | -32.22% | 21.11% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -3.70% | 72.13% | 19.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEC0.DE and QDVF.DE is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2021 | 0.17 |
The correlation between SEC0.DE and QDVF.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEC0.DE vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SEC0.DE
QDVF.DE
SEC0.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEC0.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.32 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.81 | 2.54 | +12.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 52.61 | 7.98 | +44.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEC0.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.89 | 1.82 | +4.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.28 | +0.89 |
Drawdowns
SEC0.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEC0.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.35%, smaller than the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEC0.DE and QDVF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEC0.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.35% | -65.81% | +26.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.90% | -17.23% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.35% | -27.13% | -12.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -8.92% | +6.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.85% | -17.41% | +5.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 5.49% | -1.85% |
Volatility
SEC0.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) at 7.70%. This indicates that SEC0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEC0.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 7.70% | +5.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.14% | 20.43% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.42% | 24.05% | +8.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.95% | 26.95% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.95% | 28.68% | +1.27% |
SEC0.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEC0.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEC0.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SEC0.DE nor QDVF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SEC0.DE and QDVF.DE have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SEC0.DE.
SEC0.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while QDVF.DE is Energy Equities. SEC0.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped, while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SEC0.DE and 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
Find the right allocation for SEC0.DE and QDVF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer