SEAD.DE vs. XQUA.DE
SEAD.DE (UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist) and XQUA.DE (Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - SEAD.DE tracks the JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Diversified 3% capped 1-5 (EUR Hedged) while XQUA.DE tracks the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SEAD.DE returned 0.42%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for XQUA.DE. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEAD.DE charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for XQUA.DE.
Performance
SEAD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEAD.DE achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than XQUA.DE's 1.67% return.
SEAD.DE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 4.92%
- 3Y*
- 5.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- —
XQUA.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 5.29%
- 3Y*
- 1.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
SEAD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEAD.DE UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist | 0.82% | 7.17% | 4.95% | 5.22% | -12.53% | -1.42% | 1.00% | 1.37% |
XQUA.DE Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D | 1.67% | -1.83% | 4.80% | 3.61% | -12.81% | 6.04% | -3.38% | 1.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEAD.DE and XQUA.DE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2019 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SEAD.DE and XQUA.DE has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEAD.DE vs. XQUA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SEAD.DE
XQUA.DE
SEAD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (SEAD.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEAD.DE | XQUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.16 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 1.28 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.84 | 3.54 | +6.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEAD.DE | XQUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 0.91 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.05 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.16 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
SEAD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEAD.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, smaller than the maximum XQUA.DE drawdown of -20.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEAD.DE and XQUA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEAD.DE | XQUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.40% | -20.18% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.08% | -4.12% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.40% | -11.44% | +9.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.40% | -16.68% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -8.97% | +8.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.26% | -8.61% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 1.49% | -0.99% |
Volatility
SEAD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (SEAD.DE) is 0.76%, while Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that SEAD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XQUA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEAD.DE | XQUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 1.13% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.39% | 3.85% | -1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89% | 5.82% | -2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.30% | 8.31% | -4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.33% | 8.85% | -3.52% |
SEAD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEAD.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than XQUA.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEAD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Dividend Comparison
SEAD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, more than XQUA.DE's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEAD.DE UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist | 5.84% | 4.51% | 5.70% | 4.36% | 4.23% | 3.36% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XQUA.DE Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D | 3.90% | 4.38% | 4.01% | 4.02% | 6.75% | 3.16% | 4.33% | 3.72% | 2.50% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEAD.DE and XQUA.DE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEAD.DE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEAD.DE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XQUA.DE.
SEAD.DE tracks JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Diversified 3% capped 1-5 (EUR Hedged), while XQUA.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for SEAD.DE and 0.45% for XQUA.DE.
Find the right allocation for SEAD.DE and XQUA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer