PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEACX vs. VIITX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEACX vs. VIITX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) and Vanguard Institutional Intermediate-Term Bond Fund (VIITX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEACX achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than VIITX's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SEACX has underperformed VIITX with an annualized return of 1.12%, while VIITX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.12% annualized return.


SEACX

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
1.12%

VIITX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.76%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
4.88%
5Y*
1.44%
10Y*
2.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEACX vs. VIITX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEACX
Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund
-0.19%6.50%1.43%5.54%-11.55%-2.01%4.97%6.96%-0.12%2.24%
VIITX
Vanguard Institutional Intermediate-Term Bond Fund
0.42%7.23%3.67%5.31%-7.99%-1.02%6.17%6.44%0.87%2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SEACX and VIITX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2015

0.92

The correlation between SEACX and VIITX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEACX vs. VIITX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEACX
SEACX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SEACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEACX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SEACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEACX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VIITX
VIITX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VIITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIITX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VIITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIITX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEACX vs. VIITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) and Vanguard Institutional Intermediate-Term Bond Fund (VIITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEACXVIITXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.38

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

2.64

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.85

8.58

-3.73

SEACX vs. VIITX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the VIITX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEACX and VIITX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEACXVIITXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.01

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.38

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.69

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.75

-0.09

Drawdowns

SEACX vs. VIITX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEACX drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, which is greater than VIITX's maximum drawdown of -11.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEACX and VIITX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEACXVIITXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-11.86%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-1.89%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.90%

-3.32%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.34%

-11.86%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.96%

-11.86%

-5.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-1.00%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-2.13%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.58%

+0.34%

Volatility

SEACX vs. VIITX - Volatility Comparison

Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to Vanguard Institutional Intermediate-Term Bond Fund (VIITX) at 0.86%. This indicates that SEACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIITX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEACXVIITXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

0.86%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

1.84%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71%

2.49%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.85%

3.85%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.90%

3.06%

+0.84%

SEACX vs. VIITX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEACX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VIITX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEACX vs. VIITX - Dividend Comparison

SEACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than VIITX's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEACX
Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund
3.35%2.72%2.78%2.06%1.67%1.41%1.86%2.26%2.22%1.98%2.18%2.30%
VIITX
Vanguard Institutional Intermediate-Term Bond Fund
4.57%4.51%4.71%3.61%2.14%2.20%2.87%2.69%2.62%2.04%2.95%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SEACX and VIITX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SEACX has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to VIITX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEACX dropped -16.96% vs VIITX's -11.86%.

VIITX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEACX and VIITX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer