SE vs. AYA.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SE (Sea Limited) and AYA.TO (Aya Gold & Silver Inc.) are both stocks. SE operates in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia (Communication Services), while AYA.TO operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, SE returned -21.47%/yr vs 22.08%/yr for AYA.TO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SE vs. AYA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sea Limited (SE) and Aya Gold & Silver Inc. (AYA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SE is traded in USD, while AYA.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AYA.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SE achieves a -34.98% return, which is significantly lower than AYA.TO's 30.26% return.

SE

• 1D: -3.21%
• 1M: -11.31%
• YTD: -34.98%
• 6M: -33.66%
• 1Y: -46.36%
• 3Y*: 8.08%
• 5Y*: -21.47%
• 10Y*: —

AYA.TO

• 1D: 7.18%
• 1M: -12.73%
• YTD: 30.26%
• 6M: 22.72%
• 1Y: 94.00%
• 3Y*: 40.51%
• 5Y*: 22.08%
• 10Y*: 45.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SE vs. AYA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SE Sea Limited	-34.98%	20.24%	161.98%	-22.16%	-76.74%	12.39%	394.90%	255.30%	-15.08%	-17.97%
AYA.TO Aya Gold & Silver Inc.	30.26%	91.62%	1.97%	10.27%	-11.18%	148.17%	102.23%	6.48%	7.43%	16.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SE and AYA.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017	0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap SE : $52.76B AYA.TO : CA$3.88B
EPS SE : $2.57 AYA.TO : $0.60
PE Ratio SE : 32.21 AYA.TO : 31.07
PEG Ratio SE : 0.15 AYA.TO : 0.06
PS Ratio SE : 2.06 AYA.TO : 9.44
PB Ratio SE : 4.11 AYA.TO : 6.06
Total Revenue (TTM) SE : $25.19B AYA.TO : $283.62M
Gross Profit (TTM) SE : $11.15B AYA.TO : $155.19M
EBITDA (TTM) SE : $2.33B AYA.TO : $167.72M

Return for Risk

SE vs. AYA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SE

SE Risk / Return Rank: 10
SE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
SE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
SE Omega Ratio Rank: 8
SE Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
SE Martin Ratio Rank: 13

AYA.TO

AYA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 78
AYA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
AYA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
AYA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
AYA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
AYA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SE vs. AYA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sea Limited (SE) and Aya Gold & Silver Inc. (AYA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SE	AYA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.92	1.21	-2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.37	1.81	-3.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.23	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	2.27	-3.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	6.06	-7.32

SE vs. AYA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SE Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the AYA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SE and AYA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SE vs. AYA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SE drawdown since its inception was -90.51%, roughly equal to the maximum AYA.TO drawdown of -87.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SE and AYA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SE	AYA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.51%	-87.28%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.22%	-41.64%	-18.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.22%	-55.59%	-4.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.51%	-56.77%	-33.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.40%	-13.48%	-63.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.10%	-40.11%	-3.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.57%	15.57%	+21.00%

Volatility

SE vs. AYA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sea Limited (SE) is 14.69%, while Aya Gold & Silver Inc. (AYA.TO) has a volatility of 30.52%. This indicates that SE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AYA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SE	AYA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.69%	30.52%	-15.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.05%	58.49%	-20.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.74%	78.41%	-27.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.13%	67.96%	-3.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.59%	78.18%	-15.59%

Dividends

SE vs. AYA.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SE nor AYA.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SE vs. AYA.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sea Limited and Aya Gold & Silver Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported a gross profit of 3.15B and revenue of 7.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

AYA.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aya Gold & Silver Inc. reported a gross profit of 82.27M and revenue of 115.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.3%.

SE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported an operating income of 565.39M and revenue of 7.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

AYA.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aya Gold & Silver Inc. reported an operating income of 76.31M and revenue of 115.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 66.2%.

SE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported a net income of 427.94M and revenue of 7.10B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

AYA.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aya Gold & Silver Inc. reported a net income of 47.54M and revenue of 115.35M, resulting in a net margin of 41.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SE and AYA.TO in my portfolio?

SE and AYA.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.