PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDYYX vs. FGRTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDYYX vs. FGRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (SDYYX) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SDYYX having a 10.45% return and FGRTX slightly higher at 10.50%. Over the past 10 years, SDYYX has underperformed FGRTX with an annualized return of 14.88%, while FGRTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.48% annualized return.


SDYYX

1D
0.11%
1M
5.64%
YTD
10.45%
6M
10.01%
1Y
27.23%
3Y*
21.94%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
14.88%

FGRTX

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.41%
YTD
10.50%
6M
12.42%
1Y
31.38%
3Y*
25.59%
5Y*
16.32%
10Y*
16.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDYYX vs. FGRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDYYX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund
10.45%18.85%24.65%21.47%-16.51%31.05%20.21%27.13%-8.08%19.29%
FGRTX
Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund
10.50%26.92%25.98%26.51%-8.98%26.29%12.96%31.07%-7.44%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SDYYX and FGRTX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.93

The correlation between SDYYX and FGRTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDYYX vs. FGRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDYYX
SDYYX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SDYYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDYYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDYYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SDYYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDYYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FGRTX
FGRTX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FGRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FGRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDYYX vs. FGRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (SDYYX) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDYYXFGRTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.49

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

3.59

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.91

16.31

-3.40

SDYYX vs. FGRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDYYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the FGRTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDYYX and FGRTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDYYXFGRTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.70

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.98

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.91

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.48

+0.32

Drawdowns

SDYYX vs. FGRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDYYX drawdown since its inception was -32.42%, smaller than the maximum FGRTX drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDYYX and FGRTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDYYXFGRTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.42%

-56.17%

+23.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.96%

-8.99%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.28%

-18.51%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.28%

-23.35%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.42%

-35.18%

+2.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.32%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-8.72%

+4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

1.98%

+0.18%

Volatility

SDYYX vs. FGRTX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (SDYYX) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) at 2.71%. This indicates that SDYYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDYYXFGRTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

2.71%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

9.06%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

11.98%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.32%

16.70%

+1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.55%

18.12%

+0.43%

SDYYX vs. FGRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDYYX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FGRTX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDYYX vs. FGRTX - Dividend Comparison

SDYYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.67%, more than FGRTX's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGRTX
Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund
3.52%3.89%2.68%2.06%4.38%4.79%7.96%12.98%21.72%15.57%1.97%4.16%
SDYYX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund
18.67%20.62%11.70%9.69%14.47%11.12%7.62%1.87%2.33%1.78%1.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SDYYX and FGRTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SDYYX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to FGRTX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDYYX dropped -32.42% vs FGRTX's -56.17%.

FGRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDYYX and FGRTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer